Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36221270›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2022

A deep learning-based diagnostic pattern for ultrasound breast imaging: can it reduce unnecessary biopsy?

Yi-Cheng Zhu, Jian-Guo Sheng, Shu-Hao Deng, Quan Jiang, Jia Guo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Cheng ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Guo ShengDepartment of Ultrasound, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shu-Hao DengDepartment of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Quan JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jia GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CNPudong New Area People's Hospital · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNShuguang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early studies have demonstrated the potential of deep learning in bringing revolutionary changes in medical analysis. However, it is unknown which deep learning based diagnostic pattern is more effective for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions (BLs) and can assist radiologists to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Methods: A total of 506 malignant BLs and 557 benign BLs were enrolled in this study after excluding incomplete ultrasound images. 396 malignant BLs and 447 benign BLs were included in the training cohort while 110 malignant and 110 benign BLs were included in the validation cohort. All BLs in the training and validation cohort were biopsy-proven. The most common convolutional neural networks (VGG-16 and VGG-19) were applied to identify malignant and benign BLs using grey-scale ultrasound images. Two radiologists determined the malignant (suggestion for biopsy) and benign (suggestion for follow-up) BLs with a 2-step reading session. The first step was based on conventional ultrasound (US) images alone to make a biopsy or follow-up decision. The second step was to take deep learning results into account for the decision adjustment. If a deep learning result of a first-classified benign BL was above the cut-off value, then it was re-classified as malignant. Results: In terms of area under the curve (AUC), the VGG-19 model yielded the best diagnostic performance in both training [0.939, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.924-0.954] and testing dataset (0.959, 95% CI: 0.937-0.982). With the aid of deep learning models, the AUC of radiologists improved from 0.805 (95% CI: 0.744-0.865) to 0.827 (95% CI: 0.771-0.875, VGG-16) and 0.914 (95% CI: 0.871-0.957, VGG-19). The unnecessary biopsies decreased from 10.0% (11/110) to 8.2% (9/110) (assisted by VGG-16) and 0.9% (1/110) (assisted by VGG-19). Conclusions: The application of deep learning patterns in breast US may improve the diagnostic performance of radiologists by offering a second opinion. And thus, the assist of deep learning algorithm can considerably reduce the unnecessary biopsy rate in the clinical management of breast lesions.

Indexed as

breast cancerDeep learningultrasonographyVGG-16VGG-19

Identifiers

PMID36221270
PMCPMC9547710
OpenAlexW4295808910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.