Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36221261›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

The cloacal microbiome of a cavity-nesting raptor, the lesser kestrel (

Alessandra Costanzo, Roberto Ambrosini, Andrea Franzetti, Andrea Romano, Jacopo G Cecere, Michelangelo Morganti, Diego Rubolini, Isabella Gandolfi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra CostanzoDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Policy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Roberto AmbrosiniDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Policy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Andrea FranzettiDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Andrea RomanoDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Policy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Jacopo G CecereArea Avifauna Migratrice, Istituto Superiore per La Protezione e La Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA), Ozzano Emilia, (BO), Italy.
Michelangelo MorgantiIRSA-CNR, Water Research Institute-National Research Council of Italy, Brugherio, Italy.
Diego RuboliniDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Policy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Isabella GandolfiDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale · ITWater Research Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microbial communities are found on any part of animal bodies exposed to the environment, and are particularly prominent in the gut, where they play such a major role in the host metabolism and physiology to be considered a "second genome". These communities, collectively known as "microbiome", are well studied in humans and model species, while studies on wild animals have lagged behind. This is unfortunate, as different studies suggested the central role of the gut microbiome in shaping the evolutionary trajectories of species and their population dynamics. Among bird species, only few descriptions of raptor gut microbiomes are available, and mainly carried out on captive individuals. Objectives: In this study, we aimed at improving the knowledge of raptor microbiomes by providing the first description of the gut microbiome of the lesser kestrel ( Results: The gut microbiome of the lesser kestrel was dominated by Actinobacteria (83.9%), Proteobacteria (8.6%) and Firmicutes (4.3%). We detected no differences in microbiome composition between males and females. Furthermore, the general composition of the microbiome appears similar to that of phylogenetically distant cavity-nesting species. Conclusions: Our results broaden the knowledge of raptor gut microbial communities and let us hypothesize that the distinct nest environment in terms of microclimate and presence of organic material from previous breeding attempts, to which cavity-nesting species that reuse the nest are exposed, might be an important driver shaping microbiomes.

Indexed as

FalconiformesMicrobiotaRaptorsAnimalsAnimals, WildBacteriaFemaleHumansASVCavity-nesting birdFalco naumanniLesser kestrelMicrobiomeWild raptor

Identifiers

PMID36221261
PMCPMC9548316
OpenAlexW4302299607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.