Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36221136›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

PCA outperforms popular hidden variable inference methods for molecular QTL mapping.

Heather J Zhou, Lei Li, Yumei Li, Wei Li, Jingyi Jessica Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Population-scale detection of methylation outliers from long-read genome sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather J ZhouDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9869-4896
Lei LiInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3924-2544
Yumei LiDivision of Computational Biomedicine, Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3538-6268
Wei LiDivision of Computational Biomedicine, Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9931-5990
Jingyi Jessica LiDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. lijy03@g.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9288-5648

Funding

Transfer: DNA Methylation Canyons in Human Cancers: Methods, Target Genes and Functional ConsequencesR01CA228140 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LI, WEI · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
Statistical Methods for Elucidating Regulatory Mechanisms and Functional Impacts of Transcriptome Variation at Population and Single-Cell ScalesR35GM140888 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LI, JINGYI JESSICA · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
Robust Identification and accurate quantification of RNA transcripts on a system wide scaleR01GM120507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LI, JINGYI JESSICA · 2016 to 2021
$1.7M
iDISCOVER: Integrated Data Science Training in CardioVascular MedicineT32HL139450 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUI, ALEX, PING, PEIPEI · 2018 to 2022
$1.3M
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute R01CA193466Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute R01CA228140NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228140NHLBI Division of Intramural Research T32HL139450NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL139450NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM120507NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM140888NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM140888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimating and accounting for hidden variables is widely practiced as an important step in molecular quantitative trait locus (molecular QTL, henceforth "QTL") analysis for improving the power of QTL identification. However, few benchmark studies have been performed to evaluate the efficacy of the various methods developed for this purpose.

resultsHere we benchmark popular hidden variable inference methods including surrogate variable analysis (SVA), probabilistic estimation of expression residuals (PEER), and hidden covariates with prior (HCP) against principal component analysis (PCA)-a well-established dimension reduction and factor discovery method-via 362 synthetic and 110 real data sets. We show that PCA not only underlies the statistical methodology behind the popular methods but is also orders of magnitude faster, better-performing, and much easier to interpret and use.

conclusionsTo help researchers use PCA in their QTL analysis, we provide an R package PCAForQTL along with a detailed guide, both of which are freely available at https://github.com/heatherjzhou/PCAForQTL . We believe that using PCA rather than SVA, PEER, or HCP will substantially improve and simplify hidden variable inference in QTL mapping as well as increase the transparency and reproducibility of QTL research.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociChromosome MappingPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36221136
PMCPMC9552461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.