Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36221070›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2022

Complementary medicine usage in surgery: a cross-sectional survey in Germany.

Ann-Kathrin Lederer, Yvonne Samstag, Thomas Simmet, Tatiana Syrovets, Roman Huber

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ann-Kathrin LedererCenter for Complementary Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55 - Haus Frerichs, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. ann-kathrin.lederer@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Yvonne SamstagInstitute of Immunology, Section Molecular Immunology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas SimmetInstitute of Pharmacology of Natural Products & Clinical Pharmacology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Tatiana SyrovetsInstitute of Pharmacology of Natural Products & Clinical Pharmacology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Roman HuberCenter for Complementary Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55 - Haus Frerichs, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplementary medicine (CM) is frequently used by patients, but little is known about the usage of CM in surgical patients. The study aimed to elucidate the relevance of CM in surgery.

methodsThis cross-sectional, multi-center survey utilized a paper-based questionnaire consisting of 21 questions to capture CM usage and interest as well as CM communication in visceral and thoracic surgical patients being hospitalized at the corresponding departments of surgery at the University Medical Centers in Freiburg, Heidelberg und Ulm, Germany.

resultsOverall, 151 patients consented to the survey. On average, current CM usage was stated by 44% of patients. Most frequently used CM approaches were physical exercise (63%), nutritional supplements (59%) and herbal medicine (56%). Strong interest in CM counselling was stated by 51% of patients. Almost 80% of patients wanted to be treated in a holistic manner and desired for reliable information about CM as well as CM informed physicians. Only 12% of patients communicated CM usage and interest with their attending physician. Review of literature revealed similar results showing an overall CM usage of 43%, preferring nutritional supplements and herbal medicine.

conclusionThe results of our cross-sectional study indicate a high percentage of CM users and a strong interest in CM among surgical patients. Indeed, the current communication about CM between patients and surgeons is poor. With respect to safety and quality reasons, but also to pay attention to patients' demands, physicians should be aware of patients' CM usage in surgery.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trial register (DRKS00015445).

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudesComplementary therapiesHealth knowledgeQuestionnaireSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36221070
PMCPMC9552450
OpenAlexW4304187523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.