Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36221034›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2023

The ductus arteriosus: a review of embryology to intervention.

Lauren A May, Prakash M Masand, Athar M Qureshi, Siddharth P Jadhav

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ductus Arteriosus in Fetal and Perinatal Life.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren A MayDepartment of Radiology, Nemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1600 Rockland Road, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA. Lauren.may@nemours.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8187-0558
Prakash M MasandE. B. Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Athar M QureshiThe Lillie Frank Abercrombie Section of Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5992-568X
Siddharth P JadhavE. B. Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3683-1514
Baylor College of Medicine · USAlfred I. duPont Hospital for Children · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the physiology of the ductus arteriosus, the pathophysiology of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), and the role advanced imaging such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can play in guiding diagnosis and percutaneous or surgical intervention. A PDA can have variable clinical and radiologic presentations and can be important to characterize in patients with vascular rings, aortic maldevelopment and congenital heart disease. An understanding of the PDA and the application of CT and MRI can allow the radiologist to provide key information to physicians who plan to close a PDA or maintain PDA patency in the setting of ductal-dependent congenital heart disease.

Indexed as

Ductus ArteriosusDuctus Arteriosus, PatentHeart Defects, CongenitalAortaHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedAortaChildrenComputed tomographyCongenital heart diseaseDuctus arteriosusMagnetic resonance imagingPatent ductus arteriosusVascular ring

Identifiers

PMID36221034
OpenAlexW4304606599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.