Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36221021›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

Continuous Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring During Single-Port Mediastinoscopic Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Shuhei Komatsu, Tomoki Konishi, Daiki Matsubara, Koji Soga, Katsumi Shimomura, Jun Ikeda, Fumihiro Taniguchi, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Yasuhiro Shioaki, Eigo Otsuji

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuhei KomatsuDepartment of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto, 605-0981, Japan. skomatsu@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
Tomoki KonishiDepartment of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto, 605-0981, Japan.
Daiki MatsubaraDepartment of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto, 605-0981, Japan.
Koji SogaDepartment of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto, 605-0981, Japan.
Katsumi ShimomuraDepartment of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto, 605-0981, Japan.
Jun IkedaDepartment of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto, 605-0981, Japan.
Fumihiro TaniguchiDepartment of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto, 605-0981, Japan.
Hitoshi FujiwaraDivision of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kawaramachi-hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Yasuhiro ShioakiDepartment of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto, 605-0981, Japan.
Eigo OtsujiDivision of Digestive Surgery (Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Division), Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kawaramachi-hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Kyoto first Red Cross hospital · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough single-port mediastinoscopic radical esophagectomy is ultimate minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer without thoracotomy or the thoracoscopic approach, the high incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy remains a pivotal clinical issue.

methodsThis study included 41 patients who underwent single-port mediastinoscopic radical esophagectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy between September 2014 and March 2022. Among these, continuous nerve monitoring (CNM) for RLN was done in 25 patients (CNM group), while the remaining 16 patients underwent without CNM (non-CNM group). Clinical benefits of CNM for RLN were evaluated.

resultsThe overall incidence of postoperative RLN palsy was 14.6% (6/41). The CNM group showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative RLN palsy as compared to the non-CNM group (P = 0.026: CNM vs. non-CRNM: 4.0% (1/25) vs. 31.2% (5/16)). The CNM group had a lower incidence of postoperative pneumoniae (CNM vs. non-CNM: 4.0% (1/25) vs. 18.8% (3/16)) and shorter days of postoperative hospital stay (CNM vs. non-CNM: 13 days vs. 41 days). Multivariate analysis revealed that the CNM use (odds ratio 0.07; 95% CI 0.05-0.98) was an independent factor avoiding postoperative RLN palsy.

conclusionThe CNM for RLN contributes to a remarkable reduction in the risk of postoperative RLN palsy and improvement in outcomes in single-port mediastinoscopic radical esophagectomy.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsVocal Cord ParalysisEsophagectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionRecurrent Laryngeal NerveRetrospective StudiesEsophageal cancerIntraoperative nerve monitoringMediastinoscopic esophagectomyPneumoniaRecurrent laryngeal nerve palsy

Identifiers

PMID36221021
OpenAlexW4304208649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.