Appointment Non-attendance for Telehealth Versus In-Person Primary Care Visits at a Large Public Healthcare System.

backgroundAppointment non-attendance has clinical, operational, and financial implications for patients and health systems. How telehealth services are associated with non-attendance in primary care is not well-described, nor are patient characteristics associated with telehealth non-attendance.

objectiveWe sought to compare primary care non-attendance for telehealth versus in-person visits and describe patient characteristics associated with telehealth non-attendance.

designAn observational study of electronic health record data.

participantsPatients with primary care encounters at 23 adult primary care clinics at a large, urban public healthcare system from November 1, 2019, to August 31, 2021. MAIN MEASURES: We analyzed non-attendance by modality (telephone, video, in-person) during three time periods representing different availability of telehealth using hierarchal multiple logistic regression to control for patient demographics and variation within patients and clinics. We stratified by modality and used hierarchal multiple logistic regression to assess for associations between patient characteristics and non-attendance in each modality. KEY

resultsThere were 1,219,781 scheduled adult primary care visits by 329,461 unique patients: 754,149 (61.8%) in-person, 439,295 (36.0%) telephonic, and 26,337 (2.2%) video visits. Non-attendance for telephone visits was initially higher than that for in-person visits (adjusted odds ratio 1.04 [95% CI 1.02, 1.07]) during the early telehealth availability period, but decreased later (0.82 [0.81, 0.83]). Non-attendance for video visits was higher than for in-person visits during the early (4.37 [2.74, 6.97]) and later (2.02 [1.95, 2.08]) periods. Telephone visits had fewer differences in non-attendance by demographics; video visits were associated with increased non-attendance for patients who were older, male, had a primary language other than English or Spanish, and had public or no insurance.

conclusionsTelephonic visits may improve access to care and be more easily adoptable among diverse populations. Further attention to implementation may be needed to avoid impeding access to care for certain populations using video visits.