ArticleScientific reports2022
Closed-loop stimulation of lateral cervical spinal cord in upper-limb amputees to enable sensory discrimination: a case study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effective Interventions in Restoring Mobility and Relieving Pain After Lower Limb Amputation.Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine · 2026Article
- Characterizing spinal reflexes evoked by sensory spinal cord stimulation in people with lower-limb amputation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- xDev: a mixed-signal, software-defined neurotechnology interface platform for accelerated system development.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Somatosensory restoration and neural control strategies in lower-limb prostheses.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Review
- Techniques to mitigate lead migration for percutaneous trials of cervical spinal cord stimulation.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- The effects of neuron morphology and spatial distribution on the selectivity of dorsal root ganglion stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Sensory integration for neuroprostheses: from functional benefits to neural correlates.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Review
- A preliminary study exploring the effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on spinal excitability and phantom limb pain in people with a transtibial amputation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Biomimetic computer-to-brain communication enhancing naturalistic touch sensations via peripheral nerve stimulation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Restoration of natural somatic sensations to the amputees: finding the right combination of neurostimulation methods.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling of sensory responses in deep brain stimulation.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Sensory Restoration for Improved Motor Control of Prostheses.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern myoelectric prosthetic hands have multiple independently controllable degrees of freedom, but require constant visual attention to use effectively. Somatosensory feedback provides information not available through vision alone and is essential for fine motor control of our limbs. Similarly, stimulation of the nervous system can potentially provide artificial somatosensory feedback to reduce the reliance on visual cues to efficiently operate prosthetic devices. We have shown previously that epidural stimulation of the lateral cervical spinal cord can evoke tactile sensations perceived as emanating from the missing arm and hand in people with upper-limb amputation. In this case study, two subjects with upper-limb amputation used this somatotopically-matched tactile feedback to discriminate object size and compliance while controlling a prosthetic hand. With less than 30 min of practice each day, both subjects were able to use artificial somatosensory feedback to perform a subset of the discrimination tasks at a success level well above chance. Subject 1 was consistently more adept at determining object size (74% accuracy; chance: 33%) while Subject 2 achieved a higher accuracy level in determining object compliance (60% accuracy; chance 33%). In each subject, discrimination of the other object property was only slightly above or at chance level suggesting that the task design and stimulation encoding scheme are important determinants of which object property could be reliably identified. Our observations suggest that changes in the intensity of artificial somatosensory feedback provided via spinal cord stimulation can be readily used to infer information about object properties with minimal training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.