Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36220842›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Biological invasions as a selective filter driving behavioral divergence.

David G Chapple, Annalise C Naimo, Jack A Brand, Marcus Michelangeli, Jake M Martin, Celine T Goulet, Dianne H Brunton, Andrew Sih, Bob B M Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Modeling Control of Invasive Fire Ants by Gene Drive.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Range expansion during recolonization: what does animal personality have to do with it?Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David G Chapple *School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia. David.Chapple@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7720-6280
Annalise C Naimo *School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Jack A Brand *School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Marcus MichelangeliSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Jake M MartinSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9544-9094
Celine T GouletSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Dianne H BruntonSchool of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andrew SihDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Bob B M WongSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions are a multi-stage process (i.e., transport, introduction, establishment, spread), with each stage potentially acting as a selective filter on traits associated with invasion success. Behavior (e.g., exploration, activity, boldness) plays a key role in facilitating species introductions, but whether invasion acts as a selective filter on such traits is not well known. Here we capitalize on the well-characterized introduction of an invasive lizard (Lampropholis delicata) across three independent lineages throughout the Pacific, and show that invasion shifted behavioral trait means and reduced among-individual variation-two key predictions of the selective filter hypothesis. Moreover, lizards from all three invasive ranges were also more behaviorally plastic (i.e., greater within-individual variation) than their native range counterparts. We provide support for the importance of selective filtering of behavioral traits in a widespread invasion. Given that invasive species are a leading driver of global biodiversity loss, understanding how invasion selects for specific behaviors is critical for improving predictions of the effects of alien species on invaded communities.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesLizardsAnimalsBiodiversityPlasticsPlastics

Identifiers

PMID36220842
PMCPMC9553908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.