Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36220772›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology.

Laura Marchetti, Riccardo Nifosì, Pier Luigi Martelli, Eleonora Da Pozzo, Valentina Cappello, Francesco Banterle, Maria Letizia Trincavelli, Claudia Martini, Massimo D'Elia

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantum Computing in Medicine.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura MarchettiUniversity of Pisa, Department of Pharmacy, via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2110-9481
Riccardo NifosìNEST, Istituto Nanoscienze-CNR and Scuola Normale Superiore, P.zza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa Italy.
Pier Luigi MartelliUniversity of Bologna, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, via San Giacomo 9/2, 40126 Bologna Italy.
Eleonora Da PozzoUniversity of Pisa, Department of Pharmacy, via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa Italy.
Valentina CappelloItalian Institute of Technology, Center for Materials Interfaces, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera (PI), Italy.
Francesco BanterleNational Research Council, ISTI-CNR, via Moruzzi 1, 56126 Pisa Italy.
Maria Letizia TrincavelliUniversity of Pisa, Department of Pharmacy, via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa Italy.
Claudia MartiniUniversity of Pisa, Department of Pharmacy, via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9379-3027
Massimo D'EliaUniversity of Pisa, Department of Physics, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, 56127, Pisa Italy.

Funding

University of Pisa PRA 2020-2021 92
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent biotechnological progress has allowed life scientists and physicians to access an unprecedented, massive amount of data at all levels (molecular, supramolecular, cellular and so on) of biological complexity. So far, mostly classical computational efforts have been dedicated to the simulation, prediction or de novo design of biomolecules, in order to improve the understanding of their function or to develop novel therapeutics. At a higher level of complexity, the progress of omics disciplines (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) has prompted researchers to develop informatics means to describe and annotate new biomolecules identified with a resolution down to the single cell, but also with a high-throughput speed. Machine learning approaches have been implemented to both the modelling studies and the handling of biomedical data. Quantum computing (QC) approaches hold the promise to resolve, speed up or refine the analysis of a wide range of these computational problems. Here, we review and comment on recently developed QC algorithms for biocomputing, with a particular focus on multi-scale modelling and genomic analyses. Indeed, differently from other computational approaches such as protein structure prediction, these problems have been shown to be adequately mapped onto quantum architectures, the main limit for their immediate use being the number of qubits and decoherence effects in the available quantum machines. Possible advantages over the classical counterparts are highlighted, along with a description of some hybrid classical/quantum approaches, which could be the closest to be realistically applied in biocomputation.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyComputing MethodologiesAlgorithmsGenomicsQuantum Theorybiomoleculesgenomicsmolecular modellingquantum algorithmsquantum machine learning

Identifiers

PMID36220772
PMCPMC9677474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.