Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36220332›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2023

Beyond the NEI-VFQ: Recent Experience in the Development and Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Inherited Retinal Diseases.

Todd Durham, Judit Banhazi, Francesco Patalano, Thiran Jayasundera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Todd DurhamFoundation Fighting Blindness, Columbia, Maryland 21045, USA.
Judit BanhaziNovartis, Basel-Stadt 4056, Switzerland.
Francesco PatalanoNovartis, Basel-Stadt 4056, Switzerland.
Thiran JayasunderaUniversity of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are tools designed to capture how a patient feels or functions, without the input or interpretation of anyone else. The earliest PROMs used in studies of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) lack the validity required for therapy development today. The NEI-VFQ was one of the earliest PROMs developed using concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing of patients, but it lacks items that are common to patients with IRDs and it has poor measurement properties. Recent advances in PROM development include the Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire (MRDQ) and the ViSIO-PRO for nonsyndromic retinitis pigmentosa (RP), both of which have been qualitatively and quantitatively validated. As these new tools are used in clinical studies, they will generate additional evidence about their measurement characteristics. With the latest advances in PROM development for IRDs, it is now possible to move beyond the NEI-VFQ to measure what is truly important to patients.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRetinal DiseasesHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36220332
PMCPMC9979850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.