SynthesisBMJ open2022
Improving quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of hospital-based quality improvement interventions.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Oncologic Liver Resections in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Opportunities to Improve Evidence and Outcomes.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions for improving critical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Intensive care medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Quality improvement in emergency units in low resource settings: a qualitative assessment for understanding challenges and delivering solutions.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Ensuring Safe Surgery: A Closed-Loop Audit of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Practices.Cureus · 2025Article
- Addressing the state of surgical care In Kenya: challenges, opportunities, and future directions.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Article
- Expanding surgical access in Africa through improved health insurance schemes: A review.Medicine · 2024Review
- Surgical System Efficiency and Operative Productivity in Public and Private Health Facilities in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation.Global health, science and practice · 2024Article
- Factors associated with surgical site infection in myocardial revascularization: a retrospective longitudinal study.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023Observational
- Achieving global surgical excellence: an evidence-based framework to guide surgical quality improvement programs in low and middle income countries.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo systematically review existing literature on hospital-based quality improvement studies in sub-Saharan Africa that aim to improve surgical and anaesthesia care, capturing clinical, process and implementation outcomes in order to evaluate the impact of the intervention and implementation learning.
designWe conducted a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.
settingLiterature on hospital-based quality improvement studies in sub-Saharan Africa reviewed until 31 December 2021.
participantsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, CINAHL, Web of Science databases and grey literature were searched.
interventionWe extracted data on intervention characteristics and how the intervention was delivered and evaluated. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Importantly, we assessed whether clinical, process and implementation outcomes were collected and separately categorised the outcomes under the Institute of Medicine quality domains. Risk of bias was not assessed.
resultsOf 1573 articles identified, 49 were included from 17/48 sub-Saharan African countries, 16 of which were low-income or lower middle-income countries. Almost two-thirds of the studies took place in East Africa (31/49, 63.2%). The most common intervention focus was reduction of surgical site infection (12/49, 24.5%) and use of a surgical safety checklist (14/49, 28.6%). Use of implementation and quality improvement science methods were rare. Over half the studies measured clinical outcomes (29/49, 59.2%), with the most commonly reported ones being perioperative mortality (13/29, 44.8%) and surgical site infection rate (14/29, 48.3%). Process and implementation outcomes were reported in over two thirds of the studies (34/49, 69.4% and 35, 71.4%, respectively). The most studied quality domain was safety (44/49, 89.8%), with efficiency (4/49, 8.2%) and equitability (2/49, 4.1%) the least studied domains.
conclusionsThere are few hospital-based studies that focus on improving the quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa. Use of implementation and quality improvement methodologies remain low, and some quality domains are neglected. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019125570.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.