Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36220318›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Improving quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of hospital-based quality improvement interventions.

Nataliya Brima, Imran O Morhason-Bello, Vandy Charles, Justine Davies, Andy Jm Leather

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nataliya BrimaKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK nataliya.brima@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6930-5166
Imran O Morhason-BelloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine/University College Hospital, University of Ibadan, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-7448-4824
Vandy CharlesStatistics Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Justine DaviesUniversity of Birmingham Institute of Applied Health Research, Birmingham, UK.
Andy Jm LeatherKing's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo systematically review existing literature on hospital-based quality improvement studies in sub-Saharan Africa that aim to improve surgical and anaesthesia care, capturing clinical, process and implementation outcomes in order to evaluate the impact of the intervention and implementation learning.

designWe conducted a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.

settingLiterature on hospital-based quality improvement studies in sub-Saharan Africa reviewed until 31 December 2021.

participantsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, CINAHL, Web of Science databases and grey literature were searched.

interventionWe extracted data on intervention characteristics and how the intervention was delivered and evaluated. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Importantly, we assessed whether clinical, process and implementation outcomes were collected and separately categorised the outcomes under the Institute of Medicine quality domains. Risk of bias was not assessed.

resultsOf 1573 articles identified, 49 were included from 17/48 sub-Saharan African countries, 16 of which were low-income or lower middle-income countries. Almost two-thirds of the studies took place in East Africa (31/49, 63.2%). The most common intervention focus was reduction of surgical site infection (12/49, 24.5%) and use of a surgical safety checklist (14/49, 28.6%). Use of implementation and quality improvement science methods were rare. Over half the studies measured clinical outcomes (29/49, 59.2%), with the most commonly reported ones being perioperative mortality (13/29, 44.8%) and surgical site infection rate (14/29, 48.3%). Process and implementation outcomes were reported in over two thirds of the studies (34/49, 69.4% and 35, 71.4%, respectively). The most studied quality domain was safety (44/49, 89.8%), with efficiency (4/49, 8.2%) and equitability (2/49, 4.1%) the least studied domains.

conclusionsThere are few hospital-based studies that focus on improving the quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa. Use of implementation and quality improvement methodologies remain low, and some quality domains are neglected. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019125570.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaQuality ImprovementAfrica South of the SaharaHospitalsHumansSurgical Wound InfectionOrganisational developmentQuality in health careSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID36220318
PMCPMC9557325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.