Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219797›Full record

Observational studyNeurology2022

Effectiveness of Antiseizure Medication Duotherapies in Patients With Glioma: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.

Pim B van der Meer, Linda Dirven, Marta Fiocco, Maaike J Vos, Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven, Martin J van den Bent, Martin J B Taphoorn, Johan A F Koekkoek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05958472 (Study on Glioma Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05958472 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Study on Glioma Patients: Understanding Their Glioma Clinical Trial Experiences

TypeobservationalSponsorPower Life Sciences Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsGlioma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Epilepsy in Patients with Gliomas.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Depression and anxiety in glioma patients.Neuro-oncology practice · 2023
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Pim B van der MeerFrom the Department of Neurology (P.M., L.D., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.D., M.J.V., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences (M.F.), Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center; Mathematical Institute (M.F.), Leiden University; Department of Neurology (M.C.M.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc; and Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute (M.J.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands. pbvandermeer@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3700-8906
Linda DirvenFrom the Department of Neurology (P.M., L.D., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.D., M.J.V., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences (M.F.), Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center; Mathematical Institute (M.F.), Leiden University; Department of Neurology (M.C.M.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc; and Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute (M.J.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marta FioccoFrom the Department of Neurology (P.M., L.D., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.D., M.J.V., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences (M.F.), Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center; Mathematical Institute (M.F.), Leiden University; Department of Neurology (M.C.M.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc; and Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute (M.J.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Maaike J VosFrom the Department of Neurology (P.M., L.D., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.D., M.J.V., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences (M.F.), Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center; Mathematical Institute (M.F.), Leiden University; Department of Neurology (M.C.M.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc; and Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute (M.J.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Mathilde C M KouwenhovenFrom the Department of Neurology (P.M., L.D., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.D., M.J.V., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences (M.F.), Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center; Mathematical Institute (M.F.), Leiden University; Department of Neurology (M.C.M.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc; and Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute (M.J.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5252-4365
Martin J van den BentFrom the Department of Neurology (P.M., L.D., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.D., M.J.V., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences (M.F.), Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center; Mathematical Institute (M.F.), Leiden University; Department of Neurology (M.C.M.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc; and Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute (M.J.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Martin J B TaphoornFrom the Department of Neurology (P.M., L.D., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.D., M.J.V., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences (M.F.), Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center; Mathematical Institute (M.F.), Leiden University; Department of Neurology (M.C.M.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc; and Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute (M.J.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Johan A F KoekkoekFrom the Department of Neurology (P.M., L.D., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.D., M.J.V., M.J.B.T., J.A.F.K.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences (M.F.), Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center; Mathematical Institute (M.F.), Leiden University; Department of Neurology (M.C.M.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc; and Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute (M.J.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAbout 30% of patients with glioma need an add-on antiseizure medication (ASM) due to uncontrolled seizures on ASM monotherapy. This study aimed to determine whether levetiracetam combined with valproic acid (LEV + VPA), a commonly prescribed duotherapy, is more effective than other duotherapy combinations including either LEV or VPA in patients with glioma.

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective observational cohort study, treatment failure (i.e., replacement by, addition of, or withdrawal of an ASM) for any reason was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included (1) treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures and (2) treatment failure due to adverse effects. Time to treatment failure was estimated from the moment of ASM duotherapy initiation. Multivariable cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were estimated to study the association between risk factors and treatment failure. The maximum duration of follow-up was 36 months.

resultsA total of 1,435 patients were treated with first-line monotherapy LEV or VPA, of which 355 patients received ASM duotherapy after they had treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures on monotherapy. LEV + VPA was prescribed in 66% (236/355) and other ASM duotherapy combinations including LEV or VPA in 34% (119/355) of patients. Patients using other duotherapy vs LEV + VPA had a higher risk of treatment failure for any reason (cause-specific adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.50 [95% CI 1.07-2.12], DISCUSSION: This observational cohort study suggests that LEV + VPA has better efficacy than other ASM combinations. Similar toxicities were experienced in the 2 groups. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with glioma with uncontrolled seizures on ASM monotherapy, LEV + VPA has better efficacy than other ASM combinations.

Indexed as

GliomaPiracetamAnticonvulsantsCohort StudiesHumansLevetiracetamRetrospective StudiesSeizuresValproic AcidAnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamPiracetamValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36219797
PMCPMC9519253
OpenAlexW4281636068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.