Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219788›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of epidemiology2023

Borrowing strength from clinical trials in analysing longitudinal data from a treated cohort: investigating the effectiveness of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the management of dementia.

Ruth Knight, Robert Stewart, Mizanur Khondoker, Sabine Landau

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Review of Methods for Research Synthesis.Statistics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth KnightOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6810-2845
Robert StewartDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Mizanur KhondokerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Sabine LandauDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_PC_17214Medical Research Council MR/K006185/1Medical Research Council MR/T045302/1Medical Research Council MR/V049879/1Medical Research Council MR/W014386/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care professionals seek information about effectiveness of treatments in patients who would be offered them in routine clinical practice. Electronic medical records (EMRs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can both provide data on treatment effects; however, each data source has limitations when considered in isolation.

methodsA novel modelling methodology which incorporates RCT estimates in the analysis of EMR data via informative prior distributions is proposed. A Bayesian mixed modelling approach is used to model outcome trajectories among patients in the EMR dataset receiving the treatment of interest. This model incorporates an estimate of treatment effect based on a meta-analysis of RCTs as an informative prior distribution. This provides a combined estimate of treatment effect based on both data sources.

resultsThe superior performance of the novel combined estimator is demonstrated via a simulation study. The new approach is applied to estimate the effectiveness at 12 months after treatment initiation of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the management of the cognitive symptoms of dementia in terms of Mini-Mental State Examination scores. This demonstrated that estimates based on either trials data only (1.10, SE = 0.316) or cohort data only (1.56, SE = 0.240) overestimated this compared with the estimate using data from both sources (0.86, SE = 0.327).

conclusionsIt is possible to combine data from EMRs and RCTs in order to provide better estimates of treatment effectiveness.

Indexed as

Cholinesterase InhibitorsDementiaCognitionHumansTreatment OutcomeCholinesterase Inhibitorsacetylcholinesterase inhibitorsBayesian modellingcognitiondementiaelectronic medical recordRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID36219788
PMCPMC10244047
OpenAlexW4304469929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.