Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219738›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Developing a risk stratification tool for predicting opioid-related respiratory depression after non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective study.

Sounak Roy, Stephen Bruehl, Xiaoke Feng, Matthew S Shotwell, Thomas Van De Ven, Andrew D Shaw, Miklos D Kertai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Overdose mortality rates for opioids and stimulant drugs are substantially higher in men than in women: state-level analysis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sounak RoyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Stephen BruehlDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Xiaoke FengDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew S ShotwellDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Thomas Van De VenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Andrew D ShawDepartment of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Miklos D KertaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA miklos.kertai@vumc.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6611-7998
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Stress and Opioid Misuse Risk: The Role of Endogenous Opioid and Endocannabinoid MechanismsR01DA050334 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BRUEHL, STEPHEN · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA050334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccurately assessing the probability of significant respiratory depression following opioid administration can potentially enhance perioperative risk assessment and pain management. We developed and validated a risk prediction tool to estimate the probability of significant respiratory depression (indexed by naloxone administration) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingSingle academic centre.

participantsWe studied n=63 084 patients (mean age 47.1±18.2 years; 50% men) who underwent emergency or elective non-cardiac surgery between 1 January 2007 and 30 October 2017.

interventionsA derivation subsample reflecting two-thirds of available patients (n=42 082) was randomly selected for model development, and associations were identified between predictor variables and naloxone administration occurring within 5 days following surgery. The resulting probability model for predicting naloxone administration was then cross-validated in a separate validation cohort reflecting the remaining one-third of patients (n=21 002).

resultsThe rate of naloxone administration was identical in the derivation (n=2720 (6.5%)) and validation (n=1360 (6.5%)) cohorts. The risk prediction model identified female sex (OR: 3.01; 95% CI: 2.73 to 3.32), high-risk surgical procedures (OR: 4.16; 95% CI: 3.78 to 4.58), history of drug abuse (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.16) and any opioids being administered on a scheduled rather than as-needed basis (OR: 8.31; 95% CI: 7.26 to 9.51) as risk factors for naloxone administration. Advanced age (OR: 0.971; 95% CI: 0.968 to 0.973), opioids administered via patient-controlled analgesia pump (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.62) and any scheduled non-opioids (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.69) were associated with decreased risk of naloxone administration. An overall risk prediction model incorporating the common clinically available variables above displayed excellent discriminative ability in both the derivation and validation cohorts (c-index=0.820 and 0.814, respectively).

conclusionOur cross-validated clinical predictive model accurately estimates the risk of serious opioid-related respiratory depression requiring naloxone administration in postoperative patients.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidRespiratory InsufficiencyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneAdult anaesthesiaPAIN MANAGEMENTSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID36219738
PMCPMC9445779
OpenAlexW4294636865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.