Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219610›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Dengue algorithms integrated into the IMCI guidelines: An updated assessment in five Southeast-Asian countries.

Stephanie Petzold, Kerstin D Rosenberger, Bridget Wills, Jacqueline Deen, Martin W Weber, Thomas Jaenisch, IDAMS IMCI study group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Stephanie PetzoldHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kerstin D RosenbergerSection Clinical Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bridget WillsOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Asia Programme, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jacqueline DeenInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Martin W WeberWHO Regional Office for Europe, Office for quality of care, Athens, Greece.
Thomas JaenischHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8252-7444
IDAMS IMCI study group
Colorado School of Public Health · USHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue is not included explicitly in the WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) algorithm. However, the assessment, classification and management of dengue has been incorporated into several IMCI country adaptations. We aimed to evaluate the dengue algorithms incorporated into IMCI guidelines and discuss the need for harmonization, including an extension of the age range for IMCI.

methodsThis study included three steps. First, we investigated dengue algorithms incorporated into five Southeast-Asian (Myanmar, Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Cambodia) country IMCI guidelines through a desk-based analysis. Second, we conducted an expert survey to elicit opinions regarding the integration of dengue and extension of the age range in IMCI. Third, we compared our findings with data from a large multicentric prospective study on acute febrile illness.

resultsWe found considerable heterogeneity between the country specific IMCI guidelines in the dengue algorithms as well as classification schemes. Most guidelines did not differentiate between diagnostic algorithms for the detection of dengue versus other febrile illness, and warning signs for progression to severe dengue. Our expert survey resulted in a consensus to further integrate dengue in IMCI and extend the age range for IMCI guidelines beyond 5 years of age. Most of the interviewees responded that their country had a stand-alone clinical guideline for dengue, which was not integrated into the IMCI approach and considered laboratory testing for dengue necessary on day three of consecutive fever. Using data from a large multicentric study of children 5-15 years of age, we could confirm that the likelihood of dengue increased with consecutive fever days. However, a significant proportion of children (36%) would be missed if laboratory testing was only offered on the third consecutive day of fever.

conclusionsThis study supports the extension of the IMCI age range beyond 5 years of age as well as the inclusion of dengue relevant content in the algorithm. Because of the challenge of distinguishing dengue from other febrile illnesses, simple laboratory testing (e.g., full blood count) should be offered at an early stage during the course of the illness. Testing only children with consecutive fever over 3 days may lead to an underdiagnosis of dengue among those with acute febrile illness in children 5-15 years of age. In addition, specific laboratory testing for dengue should be made available to peripheral health facilities.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSevere DengueChildChild, PreschoolFeverHumansProspective StudiesVietnam

Identifiers

PMID36219610
PMCPMC9586355
OpenAlexW4304206148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.