Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219336›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2022

Best clinical practice guidance for treating deep carious lesions in primary teeth: an EAPD policy document.

M Duggal, S Gizani, S Albadri, N Krämer, E Stratigaki, H J Tong, K Seremidi, D Kloukos, A BaniHani, R M Santamaría and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulpotomy for treating primary teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a call for action.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Evidence mapping and quality assessment of randomised trials related to molar incisor hypomineralisation.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Success rate and acceptability of conventional and modified hall crowns among children and parents: a randomised clinical trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Comparative evaluation of cervical pulpotomy and pulpectomy for primary molars with irreversible pulpitis: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Clinical performance of Class II resin composite restorations in primary molars with or without pulpotomy: a prospective 24-month clinical study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  13. Clinical decision-making in pulp therapy of primary teeth among Tunisian dental practitioners: a cross-sectional study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  14. How do clinicians treat irreversibly inflamed and necrotic primary molars? A worldwide survey of decision-making and practice.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  15. A long-term retrospective evaluation of pulpectomy and calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste resorption in primary teeth managed under dental general anaesthesia.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

M DuggalCollege of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
S GizaniDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
S AlbadriSchool of Dentistry, Unit of Oral Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
N KrämerDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Justus-Liebig University Gießen, Giessen, Germany.
E StratigakiDepartment of Pediatric Oral Health and Orthodontics, University Center of Dental Medicine, Basel, Switzerland.
H J TongDiscipline of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
K SeremidiDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
D KloukosDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
A BaniHaniDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
R M SantamaríaDepartment of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
S HuFaculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
M MadenLiverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
S AmendDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg (Campus Giessen) Medical Centre for Dentistry, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
C BoutsioukiDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg (Campus Giessen) Medical Centre for Dentistry, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
K BekesDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Medical University Vienna, University Clinic of Dentistry, Sensengasse 2a, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
N LygidakisLygidakis Dental Clinic (Private Dental Practice), 2 Papadiamantopoulou str. & Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528, Athens, Greece.
R FrankenbergerMedical Centre for Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Phillips-University Marburg, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg (Campus Marburg), Georg-Voigt-Str. 3, 35039, Marburg, Germany.
J MonteiroDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
V AnttonnenResearch Unit of Oral Health Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
R LeithDublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
M SobczakSpecialized Dental Practice, Warsaw, Poland.
S RajasekharanDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Oral Health Sciences, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
S ParekhDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK. s.parekh@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8866-0262
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DENational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Liverpool · GBEastman Dental Hospital · GBGhent University · BEQatar University · QASheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversität Greifswald · DEUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) has developed this best clinical practice guidance to help clinicians manage deep carious lesions in primary teeth.

methodsThree expert groups conducted systematic reviews of the relevant literature. The topics were: (1) conventional techniques (2) Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) and (3) materials. Workshops were held during the corresponding EAPD interim seminar in Oslo in April 2021. Several clinical based recommendations and statements were agreed upon, and gaps in our knowledge were identified.

resultsThere is strong evidence that indirect pulp capping and pulpotomy techniques, and 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride are shown to be effective for the management of caries in the primary dentition. Due to the strict criteria, it is not possible to give clear recommendations on which materials are most appropriate for restoring primary teeth with deep carious lesions. Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART) is not suitable for multi-surface caries, and Pre-formed Metal Crowns (PMCs) using the Hall technique reduce patient discomfort. GIC and RMGIC seem to be more favourable given the lower annual failure rate compared to HVGIC and MRGIC. Glass carbomer cannot be recommended due to inferior marginal adaptation and fractures. Compomers, hybrid composite resins and bulk-fill composite resins demonstrated similar values for annual failure rates.

conclusionThe management of deep carious lesions in primary teeth can be challenging and must consider the patient's compliance, operator skills, materials and costs. There is a clear need to increase the use of MID techniques in managing carious primary teeth as a mainstream rather than a compromise option.

Indexed as

Dental CariesPediatric DentistryChildComposite ResinsHumansPolicyTooth, DeciduousComposite ResinsCariesCaries managementDental materialsMinimal intervention dentistryPrimary molarsPulp treatment

Identifiers

PMID36219336
PMCPMC9637614
OpenAlexW4304190374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.