Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219318›Full record

SynthesisAdministration and policy in mental health2023

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of IPS Supported Employment for Young Adults with Mental Health Conditions.

Gary R Bond, Monirah Al-Abdulmunem, Jessica Marbacher, Thomas N Christensen, Vigdis Sveinsdottir, Robert E Drake

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Administration and policy in mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Services to improve outcomes in severe mental disorders.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gary R BondSocial Policy and Economics Research, Westat, Rivermill Commercial Center, 85 Mechanic St., Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA. garybond@westat.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1587-9823
Monirah Al-AbdulmunemSocial Policy and Economics Research, Westat, Rivermill Commercial Center, 85 Mechanic St., Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA.
Jessica MarbacherResearch Foundation for Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas N ChristensenCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health - CORE, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vigdis SveinsdottirHealth & Social Sciences, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Robert E DrakeSocial Policy and Economics Research, Westat, Rivermill Commercial Center, 85 Mechanic St., Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA.
Westat (United States) · USMental Health Services · DKNORCE Research AS · NOResearch Foundation For Mental Hygiene · US

Funding

ACL HHS 90IFRE0034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young adults with mental health conditions want to work and advance their education, but many need help attaining these goals. Individual Placement and Support (IPS), originally developed for working-age adults with serious mental illness, is an evidence-based employment model that may benefit young adults. This study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IPS for this population. We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of IPS for young adults with mental health conditions, supplementing our electronic search of the published literature with secondary analyses of two published RCTs. Using meta-analysis, we evaluated employment rate, job duration, and education rate. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Four evaluated IPS for young adults with early psychosis and three evaluated IPS for other young adult subgroups. All found a significantly higher employment rate for IPS than the control group. Overall, 208 (58.3%) of 357 IPS participants and 110 (32.4%) of 340 control participants were competitively employed during follow-up, yielding an overall risk ratio of 1.69 (95% CI 1.43, 1.99), z = 6.24, p < 0.001. Six of the seven studies also reported longer job duration for IPS than the control group, yielding an overall g = 0.34 (95% CI 0.09, 0.58), z = 2.72, p < 0.01. None of four RCTs examining education outcomes found a significant difference favoring IPS, but the overall risk ratio was significant: 1.33 (95% CI 1.06, 1.66), z = 2.51, p < 0.01. Although the empirical literature is limited, IPS appears to be effective in helping young adults with serious mental illness or early psychosis gain and keep competitive jobs. The impact of IPS on education outcomes is unclear. Future research should evaluate the generalizability of these findings to the broad range of young adults with mental health conditions needing help with their employment goals.

Indexed as

Employment, SupportedMental DisordersPsychotic DisordersHumansMental HealthRehabilitation, VocationalYoung AdultEmploymentIndividual Placement and SupportIPSMeta-analysisSupported educationSupported employmentYoung adults with mental health conditions

Identifiers

PMID36219318
PMCPMC10221953
OpenAlexW4304187576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.