Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219269›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2022

Physical Activity During Lockdowns Associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-analysis of 173 Studies with 320,636 Participants.

Jan Wilke, Anna Lina Rahlf, Eszter Füzéki, David A Groneberg, Luiz Hespanhol, Patrick Mai, Gabriela Martins de Oliveira, Johanna Robbin, Benedict Tan, Steffen Willwacher and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exercise Perceptions, Barriers, and Self-Efficacy Among Adults in Kuwait During the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Jan WilkeInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9147-2369
Anna Lina RahlfDepartment of Sports Science, Institute of Health, Nutrition and Sports Science, Europa-Universität Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7498-6816
Eszter FüzékiInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5466-7412
David A GronebergInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-6556
Luiz HespanholMasters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1774-4746
Patrick MaiInstitute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-651X
Gabriela Martins de OliveiraMasters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1641-3750
Johanna RobbinDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Offenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2564-7110
Benedict TanDepartment of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1762-849X
Steffen WillwacherDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Offenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-3165
Karsten Hollander *Institute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Am Kaiserkai 1, 20457, Hamburg, Germany. karsten.hollander@medicalschool-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-9665
Julian David Pillay *Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8502-8878
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEOffenburg University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversidade Cidade de São Paulo · BRChangi General Hospital · SGDurban University of Technology · ZAEuropa-Universität Flensburg · DEGerman Sport University Cologne · DEMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany countries have restricted public life in order to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2). As a side effect of related measures, physical activity (PA) levels may have decreased.

objectiveWe aimed (1) to quantify changes in PA and (2) to identify variables potentially predicting PA reductions.

methodsA systematic review with random-effects multilevel meta-analysis was performed, pooling the standardized mean differences in PA measures before and during public life restrictions.

resultsA total of 173 trials with moderate methodological quality (modified Downs and Black checklist) were identified. Compared to pre-pandemic, total PA (SMD - 0.65, 95% CI - 1.10 to - 0.21) and walking (SMD - 0.52, 95% CI - 0.29 to - 0.76) decreased while sedentary behavior increased (SMD 0.91, 95% CI: 0.17 to 1.65). Reductions in PA affected all intensities (light: SMD - 0.35, 95% CI - 0.09 to - 0.61, p = .013; moderate: SMD - 0.33, 95% CI - 0.02 to - 0.6; vigorous: SMD - 0.33, - 0.08 to - 0.58, 95% CI - 0.08 to - 0.58) to a similar degree. Moderator analyses revealed no influence of variables such as sex, age, body mass index, or health status. However, the only continent without a PA reduction was Australia and cross-sectional trials yielded higher effect sizes (p < .05).

conclusionPublic life restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in moderate reductions in PA levels and large increases in sedentary behavior. Health professionals and policy makers should therefore join forces to develop strategies counteracting the adverse effects of inactivity.

Indexed as

ConfinementsCoronavirusInactivityPublic life restrictionsSedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID36219269
PMCPMC9551244
OpenAlexW4304175572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.