Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219260›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

The role of lymph node dissection in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer patients (retrospective analysis).

Oksana Movchan, Valentin Svintsitskyi

RetractedOpen access · greenAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oksana MovchanResearch Department of Oncogynecology, National Cancer Institute, 33/43 Lomonosov Str, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine. movchan8614-1@uoel.uk.
Valentin SvintsitskyiResearch Department of Oncogynecology, National Cancer Institute, 33/43 Lomonosov Str, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine.
National Cancer Institute · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndometrial cancer in recent years has taken the lead among cancer processes of the female reproductive system. The feasibility of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection in patients with endometrial cancer has always been a controversial issue. The aim of the presented paper is to evaluate the feasibility of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection in patients with endometrial cancer, depending on the stage of the disease, postoperative complications, and patient survival, depending on the volume of surgical intervention.

methodsThe study involved 285 patients with stages of I-IV endometrioid endometrial cancer of the Pre-graduate Department of Oncogynecology of the National Cancer Institute. The average age of patients was 55 ± 5.7 years. In 74.5%, the disease was detected at stage I and uterine extirpation was performed with/without appendages.

resultsThe duration of the operation varies depending on the volume of intervention-from 1 h 30 min ± 10 min for panhysterectomy, up to 3 h 20 min ± 10 min when performing para-aortic lymph node dissection. The average number of lymph nodes removed was-7 ± 1.1 pelvic and 12 ± 1.5 para-aortic.

conclusionThe basic principles of surgical treatment consist in individual choice of the scope of surgical intervention, performing adequate lymph node dissection, and preventing relapse and metastasis of the disease.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEndometrial cancerLaparoscopyLaparotomyPelvic lymph node dissectionSurgery

Identifiers

PMID36219260
PMCPMC11796981
OpenAlexW4304183778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.