Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219244›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2022

[The intensive care diary-a communication tool].

Susanne Krotsetis, Teresa-Maria Deffner, Peter Nydahl

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susanne KrotsetisPflegeentwicklung und Pflegewissenschaft, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Teresa-Maria DeffnerKlinisches Kriseninterventionsteam, Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Peter NydahlPflegewissenschaft und -entwicklung, Pflegedirektion, AG Didaktik in der Pflege, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Haus V40, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland. peter.nydahl@uksh.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-0364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diaries in intensive care units (ICU) are mostly written by families and nurses for patients with impaired consciousness. In the diary, the development of the patients is described in plain language by daily reports. Patients can read the diary later and process their experiences and, if necessary, reframe them differently. ICU diaries reduce the risks of psychosocial sequelae of patients and families and are now used worldwide. Diaries have different purposes and also serve as a communication tool: words are written to a person who will hopefully read them later. This can help families to stay connected and better cope with the situation. However, writing a diary can also be perceived as a burden by some relatives and nurses due to lack of time or because it seems to be too close. ICU diaries can serve as a tool for patient- and family-centered care.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care UnitsCommunicationCritical IllnessHumansWritingCopingFamily centered carePostintensive care syndromePsychological adaptationPsychosocial support

Identifiers

PMID36219244
PMCPMC9552161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.