ArticleChromosoma2022
Cytogenetic status of patients with congenital malformations or suspected chromosomal abnormalities in Turkey: a comprehensive cytogenetic survey of 11,420 patients.
Article in Chromosoma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic analysis and evaluation of chromosome aberrations in major birth defects associated with infertility.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytogenetic analysis is helpful in diagnostic workup of patients having prenatal or early postnatal medical problems and provides a basis for genetic counseling or deciding on clinical treatment options. Chromosomal abnormalities (CAs) constitute one of the most important category of genetic defects which have the potential to cause irreversible disorders. In this study, chromosome analysis results of 11,420 patients having congenital malformations or suspected of having chromosomal abnormalities, who were referred to Çukurova University Research and Training Hospital Cytogenetic Laboratory over a 16-year period, were investigated, retrospectively. Of all patients analyzed, CAs were found in 1768 cases, accounting for 15.5% of all cases. It was observed that 1175 (15.5%) of CAs were numerical (10.3%) and 593 (5.2%) were structural chromosome abnormalities. Among numerical CAs, Down syndrome (DS), Turner syndrome (TS) and Klinefelter syndrome (KS) constituted common categories which were observed in 7, 1.1 and 0.9% of all cases, respectively. Among the structural CAs, translocations, inversions, fragilities, deletions,, and others were the most common categories and constituted 2.2, 0.9, 0.9, 0.7, 0.3, and 0.3% of all cases, respectively. The sex ratio (male/female) of all cases was 1.01 and of DS cases was 1.6. Our results further confirmed that cytogenetic analysis is necessary in terms of making definite diagnosis of genetic disorders, providing proper genetic counseling and clinical treatment, assessing the recurrence risk, and preventing the hereditary genetic diseases and disorders. Besides, such studies will greatly assist in constituting national and international databases or records of genetic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.