Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36219201›Full record

Trial reportArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2022

Probiotic therapy outcomes in body composition of children and adolescent with obesity, a nonrandomized controlled trial.

Thaís Léo Pacheco Marcelo, Caroline Rosa Pellicciari, Thiago Olivetti Artioli, Dânae Braga Diamante Leiderman, Ana Lúcia Torloni Gradinar, Marcelo Mimica, Cristiane Kochi

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The role of probiotics in adolescents' obesity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thaís Léo Pacheco MarceloDepartamento de Nutrição e Dietética, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Caroline Rosa PellicciariDepartamento de Pediatria, Unidade de Endocrinologia Pediátrica, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Thiago Olivetti ArtioliDepartamento de Pediatria, Unidade de Endocrinologia Pediátrica, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Dânae Braga Diamante LeidermanFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Ana Lúcia Torloni GradinarDepartamento de Nutrição e Dietética, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Marcelo MimicaDepartamento de Microbiologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Cristiane KochiDepartamento de Pediatria, Unidade de Endocrinologia Pediátrica, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, ckochi@outlook.com.
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of probiotic supplementation therapy on anthropometric values and body composition of children and adolescent with obesity. Subjects and Methods: This is a nonrandomized controlled, prospective, double-blind interventional clinical trial with primary data analysis. The sample comprised 44 pubertal children and adolescent (8-17 years old) with obesity. The patients were allocated to probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) or placebo group, with matching of gender and chronological age. Both groups received nutritional guidance, and were followed for six months. In all patients the anthropometric assessment was carried out by a nutritionist and data on weight, height and waist circumference (WC) were collected. Body composition was assessed using dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results: After six months, both groups had increased weight, height but reduced body index mass (BMI) standard deviation score, with no differences between groups. After the intervention, both groups showed a reduction in the percentage of total body fat and an increase in lean mass, but only the placebo group showed a reduction in the percentage of trunk fat. However, the variation in these parameters did not differ between groups. Conclusion: The probiotic group does not seem to have benefited from supplementation. However, we suggest that this reduction in BMI SDS in both groups may have occurred due to improvements in diet because of the nutritional advice given throughout the therapy. We concluded that supplementation with this strain of probiotic was not effective in promoting weight loss or improving the body composition of this population.

Indexed as

Body CompositionObesityAdolescentBody Mass IndexChildDouble-Blind MethodHumansProspective StudiesWaist Circumferenceadolescentbody compositionmicrobiotaPediatric obesityprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID36219201
PMCPMC10118763
OpenAlexW4304479711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.