Raising Confidentiality Concerns With a Law Mandating Access to Electronic Notes.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care Practices in the Emergency Department for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.JAMA network open · 2026
   Article
2. Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Children.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2025
   Review
3. Protecting Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence Under the Cures Act.Annals of emergency medicine · 2023
   Article
4. "I think it's something that we should lean in to": The use of OpenNotes in Canadian psychiatric care contexts by clinicians.Digital health
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Care Partners and Patient Portals-Faulty Access, Threats to Privacy, and Ample Opportunity.2020

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.