Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36218349›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022

Impact of Organism Reporting from Endotracheal Aspirate Cultures on Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patients.

Andrea M Prinzi, Rachel L Wattier, Donna J Curtis, Sonja I Ziniel, Allyson Fitzgerald, Kelly Pearce, Sarah K Parker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship: opportunities for return on investment.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea M PrinziClinical Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2949-5484
Rachel L WattierDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Donna J CurtisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Sonja I ZinielDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Allyson FitzgeraldDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Kelly PearceDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Sarah K ParkerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endotracheal aspirate cultures (EACs) help diagnose lower respiratory tract infections in mechanically ventilated patients but are limited by contamination with normal microbiota and variation in laboratory reporting. Increased use of EACs is associated with increased antimicrobial prescribing, but the impact of microbiology reporting on prescribing practices is unclear. This study was a retrospective analysis of EACs from mechanically ventilated patients at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) admitted between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019. Chart review was performed to collect all culture and Gram stain components, as well as antibiotic use directed to organisms in culture. Reporting concordance was determined for each organism using American Society for Microbiology guidelines. Days of therapy were calculated for overreported and guideline-concordant organisms. A multivariable model was used to assess the relationship between organism reporting and total days of therapy. Overall, 448 patients with 827 EACs were included in this study. Among patients with tracheostomy, 25 (8%) organisms reported from EACs were overreported and contributed 48 days of excess therapy, while 227 (29%) organisms from the EACs of endotracheally intubated patients were overreported, contributing 472 excess days of therapy. After adjustment, organism overreporting was associated with a >2-fold-higher rate of antimicrobial therapy than guideline-concordant reporting (incident rate ratio [IRR], 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23, 6.53;

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildHumansRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsculturediagnosticslaboratorymicrobiologystewardship

Identifiers

PMID36218349
PMCPMC9667758
OpenAlexW4304191946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.