Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36218305›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2022

RHD genotyping to resolve weak and discrepant RhD patient phenotypes.

Christina M Barriteau, Paul F Lindholm, Karyn Hartman, Ricardo D Sumugod, Glenn Ramsey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. IntegratingMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christina M BarriteauDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1667-7505
Paul F LindholmDepartment of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Karyn HartmanBlood Bank, Northwestern Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, Illinois, USA.
Ricardo D SumugodBlood Bank, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Glenn RamseyDepartment of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9721-5259
Northwestern University · USCentral DuPage Hospital · USNorthwestern Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe instituted RHD genotyping in our transfusion service for obstetrical patients and transfusion candidates. We sought to examine how RHD genotyping resolved weak or discrepant automated microplate direct agglutination (MDA) RhD phenotypings and impacted needs for Rh Immune Globulin (RhIG) and D-negative RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe investigated RhD phenotypes with equivocal or reagent-discrepant automated MDA (Immucor, Norcross, GA), weak-2+ immediate-spin tube typings, historically discrepant RhD typings, or D+ typings with anti-D. We performed microarray RHD genotyping (RHD BeadChip, Immucor BioArray Solutions, Warren, NJ). Patients were managed as D+ with weak-D types 1, 2, and 3, and as D-negative with all other results.

resultsOur weak-D prevalence was 0.14%. Among 138 patients (73 obstetrics, 65 transfusion candidates), 38% had weak-D types 1, 2 or 3, 25% weak partial type 4.0, 21% other partial-D variant alleles, and 15% no variant detected. One novel allele with weak partial type 4.0 variants plus c.150T>C (Val50Val) was discovered. Weak D types 1, 2 or 3 were identified in 66% (48/73) of Whites versus 3% (2/62) of diverse ethnic patients (p < .0001). RHD genotyping changed RhD management in 60 patients (43%) (49 to D+, 11 to D-negative), resulting in net conservation of D-negative RBCs (98 avoided, 14 given) and RhIG (8 avoided, 3 given).

conclusionIn our patient population, equivocal or reagent-discrepant MDA RhD phenotypes were highly specific for weak-D or partial-D RHD genotypes. Resolution of RHD genotype status reduced our use of D-negative RBCs and RhIG.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemAllelesFemaleGenotypeHumansPhenotypePregnancyRh-Hr Blood-Group Systemblood group genomicsimmunohematology (RBC serology, blood groups)

Identifiers

PMID36218305
PMCPMC9828470
OpenAlexW4304190049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.