Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36218219›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2023

Telehealth during the pandemic: Patient perceptions and policy implications.

Jacob Crouch, Karen Winters, Lei Zhang, Mary W Stewart

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Telehealth during the pandemic: Patient perceptions and policy implications.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob CrouchThe University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5847-9451
Karen WintersThe University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Lei ZhangThe University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Mary W StewartThe University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Jackson Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTelehealth's potential to improve access to specialty health care, increase favorable patient outcomes, and save money demands attention. Unfortunately, patients often fail to embrace telehealth. The COVID-19 pandemic fueled greater telehealth usage globally. Little is known about patient perceptions of telehealth in the context of a pandemic. Therefore, we sought to understand patient perceptions of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and explore relevant policy implications.

designResearchers used a cross-sectional, non-experimental design to survey 366 patients across two telehealth programs at a Mississippi academic health sciences center between November 1, 2021 and November 15, 2021.

methodsAs part of a larger, psychometric study on patient acceptance of telehealth, participants rated the item, "The COVID-19 pandemic has made me more open to using telehealth" on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). Means of the different groups were analyzed using independent t-test and one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc multiple comparisons.

resultsOf the total participants, 73% (n = 366) either agreed or strongly agreed that the COVID-19 pandemic had made them more open to using telehealth. Significant differences existed by age (p = 0.016), race/ethnicity (p = 0.015), and sex (p < 0.001), however, groups did not differ by age during post-hoc analysis. A significant difference in the mean responses was observed between black participants (M = 4.29) and white participants (M = 3.91; p = 0.011). In addition, female participants (M = 4.11) rated the item higher than male participants (M = 3.65).

conclusionAs access to telehealth increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic, patients' perceptions to telehealth seem to have shifted in the positive direction as well. Findings may be used to support expansion of telehealth and advocacy for patients in a variety of settings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Study findings indicate that participants of telehealth are more open to using telehealth due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Implementing telehealth should be a priority to increase access to care for those who have limited access to specialty care, and policymakers should advocate to decrease barriers to telehealth within their institutions.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPolicyCOVID-19 pandemicpatient perceptionstelehealth acceptancetelehealth policy

Identifiers

PMID36218219
PMCPMC9874805
OpenAlexW4304187379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.