Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36218155›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2022

Identification and management of cancer cachexia in patients: Assessment of healthcare providers' knowledge and practice gaps.

Vickie E Baracos, Andrew J Coats, Stefan D Anker, Lawrence Sherman, Tatiana Klompenhouwer, International Advisory Board, and Regional Advisory Boards for North America, Europe, and Japan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exercise as supportive care in advanced cancer-related weight loss: a feasibility study comparing patients with and without severe weight loss.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Cancer cachexia: a caregiver and advocate perspective.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2026
    Review
  5. Barriers to timely nutrition support in patients with cancer: A scoping review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Treatment barriers among patients with cancer cachexia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Vickie E BaracosDivision of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9609-1001
Andrew J CoatsScientific Director Heart Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Stefan D AnkerDivision of Cardiology and Metabolism, Department of Cardiology and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Lawrence ShermanMeducate Global, LLC, Tierra Verde, FL, USA.
Tatiana KlompenhouwerSociety on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders, Duluth, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3875-1021
International Advisory Board, and Regional Advisory Boards for North America, Europe, and Japan
Asia Society · USCenter for Global Development · USGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEThe Heart Research Institute · AUUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cachexia negatively impacts patient outcomes, quality of life and survival. Identification and management of cancer cachexia remains challenging to healthcare professionals (HCPs). The aim of this assessment was to identify current gaps in HCPs' knowledge and practice for identifying and managing adults with cancer-related cachexia. Results may guide development of new educational programmes to close identified gaps and improve outcomes of cancer patients.

methodsAn international assessment was conducted using a mixed-methods approach including focus group interviews with subject matter experts and an electronic survey of practising HCP. The assessment was led by the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders (SCWD) and was supported by in-country collaborating organizations.

resultsA quantitative survey of 58 multiple-choice questions was completed by physicians, nurses dietitians and other oncology HCP (N = 2375). Of all respondents, 23.7% lacked confidence in their ability to provide care for patients with cancer cachexia. Patients with gastrointestinal, head and neck, pulmonary cancers and leukaemia/lymphoma were reported as those at highest risk for cachexia. Only 29.1% of respondents recognized a key criterion of cancer cachexia as >5% weight loss from baseline, but many (14.4%) did not utilize a standardized definition of cancer cachexia. Despite this, most clinicians (>84%) were able to identify causes of weight loss-reduced oral intake, progressive disease, side effects of therapy and disease-related inflammation. Of all respondents, 52.7% indicated newly diagnosed patients with cancer should be screened for weight loss. In practice, 61.9% reported that patient weight was systematically tracked over time, but only 1125 (47.4%) reported they weigh their cancer patients at each visit. Treatment of cachexia focused on increasing the patient's nutritional intake by oral nutritional supplements (64.2%), energy and protein fortified foods (60.3%) and counselling by a dietitian (57.1%). Whereas many respondents (37.3%) considered cachexia inevitable, most (79.2%) believed that an interprofessional team approach could improve care and that use of standardized tools is critical.

conclusionsFindings from this international assessment highlight the challenges associated with the care of patients with cancer cachexia, opportunities for interventions to improve patient outcomes and areas of variance in care that would benefit from further analysis.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdultCachexiaHealth PersonnelHumansProfessional Practice GapsWeight LosscachexiaCancereducationguidelinesneeds assessmentnutrition

Identifiers

PMID36218155
PMCPMC9745486
OpenAlexW4304481305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.