ReviewThe Journal of physiology2023
The impact of Hodgkin-Huxley models on dendritic research.
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating latent neuronal nonlinear dynamics by sequential Monte Carlo method and sparse modeling.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- A genetic algorithm for self-supervised models of oscillatory neurodynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Signal propagation in small networks of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Article
- A cortical field theory - dynamics and symmetries.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Shaping dynamical neural computations using spatiotemporal constraints.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2024Review
- Article
- A novel non-invasive brain stimulation technique: "Temporally interfering electrical stimulation".Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Can neuron modeling constrained by ultrafast imaging data extract the native function of ion channels?Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For the past seven decades, the Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) formalism has been an invaluable tool in the arsenal of neuroscientists, allowing for robust and reproducible modelling of ionic conductances and the electrophysiological phenomena they underlie. Despite its apparent age, its role as a cornerstone of computational neuroscience has not waned. The discovery of dendritic regenerative events mediated by ionic and synaptic conductances has solidified the importance of HH-based models further, yielding new predictions concerning dendritic integration, synaptic plasticity and neuronal computation. These predictions are often validated through in vivo and in vitro experiments, advancing our understanding of the neuron as a biological system and emphasizing the importance of HH-based detailed computational models as an instrument of dendritic research. In this article, we discuss recent studies in which the HH formalism is used to shed new light on dendritic function and its role in neuronal phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.