Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36218020›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2022

Users' perspective on rehabilitation interventions for young adult cancer survivors: A group concept mapping study.

Maria Aagesen, Marc Sampedro Pilegaard, May Aasebø Hauken, Eva Elisabet Ejlersen Waehrens, Karen la Cour

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria AagesenREHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0476-3692
Marc Sampedro PilegaardThe Research Unit for User Perspectives and Community-based Interventions, the Research Group for Occupational Science, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6362-410X
May Aasebø HaukenCentre for Crisis Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Eva Elisabet Ejlersen WaehrensThe Research Unit for User Perspectives and Community-based Interventions, the Research Group for Occupational Science, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0846-1659
Karen la CourThe Research Unit for User Perspectives and Community-based Interventions, the Research Group for Occupational Science, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Oak Foundation OCAY-13-309REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative CareThe Danish Cancer Society R224-A13434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aim to identify and prioritise rehabilitation interventions to strengthen participation in everyday life for young adult cancer survivors (YACS) between 18 and 39 years, involving the perspectives of YACS and relevant stakeholders.

methodsA group concept mapping study was conducted in Denmark from 2019 to 2020. Online, participants generated and sorted ideas followed by rating their importance. Multidimensional scaling followed by hierarchical cluster analyses were applied to generate a cluster rating map of the prioritised interventions, which participants validated at a face-to-face meeting. Finally, a concluding conceptual model of prioritised rehabilitation intervention for YACS was developed.

resultsThe study involved 25 YACS, three family members and 31 professionals working with YACS. The conceptual model included 149 ideas classified into eight intervention components created by the participants: (1) Treatment and possibilities within the social and healthcare system, (2) Rights and Finance, (3) Education and Work, (4) Psychological problems, (5) Body and Everyday Life, (6) Peer-to-peer, (7) Sexuality and Relationships and (8) Family and Friends. All components were rated equally important, whereby 17 ideas across the eight components were rated very important.

conclusionThis study indicates that rehabilitation of YACS should be composed of eight equally important intervention components requiring an interdisciplinary approach.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsCluster AnalysisFamilyHumansYoung Adultcancer survivorseveryday lifehealth servicesneoplasmsrehabilitationyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID36218020
PMCPMC9786878
OpenAlexW4304184223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.