Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36217833›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Socio-cognitive analysis of farmers' water conservation behaviour: The case of the Kavar plain, Iran.

Pouria Ataei, Hamid Karimi, Seyed Reza Es'haghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pouria AtaeiDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, 108937Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid KarimiDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, 185139University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-6199-100X
Seyed Reza Es'haghiDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Education, 48425University of Tehran, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural activities have a lot of effects on the environment so that water conservation measures help produce crops and consume water resources sustainably. The present research mainly aimed to explore farmers' water conservation behaviour using the comprehensive action determination model (CADM). The research was conducted on the farmers in the Kavar plain in Fars province, Iran (N = 4000). The sample including 351 farmers was taken by the stratified random sampling technique. The measurement instrument was a questionnaire whose face and content validity was confirmed by a panel of experts. To check its reliability, a pilot study was conducted to calculate Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability (CR). The results showed that the indicators used to measure the research variables properly fitted the factor structure and the theoretical framework of the study. Based on the results, social norms (β = 0.26), personal norms (β = 0.22), attitude (β = 0.33), objective constraints (β = 0.38), and subjective constraints (β = 0.29) affect farmers' water conservation intention positively and significantly. Also, farmers' behaviour is influenced by their intention (β = 0.6), as well as their subjective (β = 0.73) and objective constraints (β = 0.58). It can be concluded that farmers' water conservation behavior is shaped by a process that involves their normative process, habitual process, situation, and attitudes.

Indexed as

Conservation of Water ResourcesFarmersAgricultureCognitionHumansIranPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsComprehensive action determination modelfarmers’ behavioursustainable agriculturesustainable developmentwater resources conservation

Identifiers

PMID36217833
PMCPMC10358611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.