Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36217810›Full record

ArticleAnnals of coloproctology2024

What can patients expect in the long term from radiofrequency thermocoagulation of hemorrhoids on bleeding, prolapse, quality of life, and recurrence: "no pain, no gain" or "no pain but a gain"?

Jean-Michel Didelot, Benjamin Raux, Romain Didelot, Franz Rudler, Aurelien Mulliez, Anthony Buisson, Armando Abergel, Pierre Blanc

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Radiofrequency Ablation for Hemorrhoidal Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Michel DidelotDepartment of Surgery, Clinique Clémentville, Montpellier, France.
Benjamin RauxDepartment of Digestive Medicine, CHU Estaing, University of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Romain DidelotDepartment of Digestive Medicine B, CHU Saint-Eloi, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Franz RudlerDepartment of Digestive Medicine B, CHU Saint-Eloi, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Aurelien MulliezBiostatistics Unit, Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, CHRU Clermont-Ferrand, University of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Anthony BuissonDepartment of Digestive Medicine, CHU Estaing, University of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Armando AbergelDepartment of Digestive Medicine, CHU Estaing, University of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pierre BlancDepartment of Digestive Medicine B, CHU Saint-Eloi, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy of hemorrhoidal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) on bleeding, prolapse, quality of life (QoL), and recurrence.

methodsThis retrospective, single-center study, with RFT performed using procedure modified via hemorrhoid exteriorization assessed the evolution of hemorrhoidal prolapse rated by Goligher scale; bleeding and discomfort (0-10), feeling of improvement and satisfaction (-5 to +5/5) by analog scales; the impact of hemorrhoids on QoL by HEMO-FISS-QoL score.

resultsFrom April 2016 to January 2021, 124 patients underwent surgery and 107 were interviewed in September 2021. The average follow-up was 30 months (range, 8-62 months). The mean work stoppage was 3 days, none in 71.0% of the cases. A mean of 4,334 J was applied. No analgesics were required for 66.4% of patients. External hemorrhoidal thrombosis was the only immediate complication in 9 patients, with no long-term reported complication. Bleeding disappeared in 53 out of 102 patients or dropped from 7 to 3 out of 10 (P<0.001). Prolapse reduced from mean grade 3 to 2 (P<0.001), discomfort from 7 to 2 out of 10 (P<0.001). HEMO-FISS-QoL score improved from 22 to 7 out of 100 (P<0.001). Feeling of improvement and overall satisfaction rate were +4/5. Recurrence occurred in 21.5% of patients at 22 months, and 6 required reoperation. Of the patients, 91.6% would choose the same procedure again and 96.3% recommend it.

conclusionRFT, although imperfect, leads to a significant improvement in hemorrhoidal symptoms and a lasting increase in QoL with minimal pain and downtime, high acceptance, and low complication and recurrence rates.

Indexed as

HemorrhoidsMinimally invasive surgical procedureQuality of lifeRadiofrequency ablationRafaelo procedure

Identifiers

PMID36217810
PMCPMC11532375
OpenAlexW4304481263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.