Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36217775›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2023

Actigraphy in studies on insomnia: Worth the effort?

Lara Rösler, Glenn van der Lande, Jeanne Leerssen, Roy Cox, Jennifer R Ramautar, Eus J W van Someren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of lemborexant vs placebo on total daytime sleep in shift workers: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparing actigraphy and diary to measure daily and average sleep in firefighters: a Bland-Altman analysis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lara RöslerDepartment of Sleep and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1046-1073
Glenn van der LandeDepartment of Sleep and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeanne LeerssenDepartment of Sleep and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roy CoxDepartment of Sleep and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jennifer R RamautarDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eus J W van SomerenDepartment of Sleep and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9970-8791
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

European Research Council ERC-ADG-2014-671084 INSOMNIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decades, actigraphy has emerged as a promising, cost-effective, and easy-to-use tool for ambulatory sleep recording. Polysomnography (PSG) validation studies showed that actigraphic sleep estimates fare relatively well in healthy sleepers. Additionally, round-the-clock actigraphy recording has been used to study circadian rhythms in various populations. To this date, however, there is little evidence that the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of insomnia can significantly benefit from actigraphy recordings. Using a case-control design, we therefore critically examined whether mean or within-subject variability of actigraphy sleep estimates or circadian patterns add to the understanding of sleep complaints in insomnia. We acquired actigraphy recordings and sleep diaries of 37 controls and 167 patients with varying degrees of insomnia severity for up to 9 consecutive days in their home environment. Additionally, the participants spent one night in the laboratory, where actigraphy was recorded alongside PSG to check whether sleep, in principle, is well estimated. Despite moderate to strong agreement between actigraphy and PSG sleep scoring in the laboratory, ambulatory actigraphic estimates of average sleep and circadian rhythm variables failed to successfully differentiate patients with insomnia from controls in the home environment. Only total sleep time differed between the groups. Additionally, within-subject variability of sleep efficiency and wake after sleep onset was higher in patients. Insomnia research may therefore benefit from shifting attention from average sleep variables to day-to-day variability or from the development of non-motor home-assessed indicators of sleep quality.

Indexed as

ActigraphySleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersCircadian RhythmHumansPolysomnographySleepactigraphyinsomnianon-parametric circadian rhythm analysissleepsleep scoring

Identifiers

PMID36217775
PMCPMC10078209
OpenAlexW4304480656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.