Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36217549›Full record

ReviewiScience2022

Perspective on uncertainty quantification and reduction in compound flood modeling and forecasting.

Peyman Abbaszadeh, David F Muñoz, Hamed Moftakhari, Keighobad Jafarzadegan, Hamid Moradkhani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peyman AbbaszadehDepartment of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Center for Complex Hydrosystems Research, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
David F MuñozDepartment of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Center for Complex Hydrosystems Research, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Hamed MoftakhariDepartment of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Center for Complex Hydrosystems Research, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Keighobad JafarzadeganDepartment of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Center for Complex Hydrosystems Research, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Hamid MoradkhaniDepartment of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Center for Complex Hydrosystems Research, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective discusses the importance of characterizing, quantifying, and accounting for various sources of uncertainties involved in different layers of hydrometeorological and hydrodynamic model simulations as well as their complex interactions and cascading effects (e.g., uncertainty propagation) in forecasting compound flooding (CF). Over the past few decades, CF has come to attention across the globe as this natural hazard results from a combination of either concurrent or successive flood drivers with larger economic, societal, and environmental impacts than those from isolated drivers. A warming climate and increased urbanization in flood-prone areas are expected to contribute to an escalation in the risk of CF in the near future. Recent advances in remote sensing and data science can provide a wide range of possibilities to account for and reduce the predictive uncertainties; hence improving the predictability of CF events, enabling risk-informed decision-making, and ensuring a sustainable CF risk governance.

Indexed as

ClimatologyEarth surface fluid flowHydrology

Identifiers

PMID36217549
PMCPMC9547283
OpenAlexW4297015017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.