ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022
Same-day consultation, simulation and lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy delivery on a Magnetic Resonance-linac.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Workflow and dosimetric results for direct-to-unit single-fraction adaptive lung SBRT delivered on the ONE-STOP prospective pilot clinical trial.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Accelerated radiotherapy pathways: a systematic review on same-day planning and treatment in radiation oncology.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Review
- A deep learning approach for predicting linear accelerator output settings in automated radiotherapy planning of oligometastatic cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical experience with a same-day simulation and treatment program for stereotactic radiation therapy on a C-arm linac.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Adaptive-driven CT simulation-free multi-fraction SBRT radiotherapy: Initial clinical experience.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Same-Day Magnetic Resonance-Guided Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases - A Single-Center Study ("BONE SHOT").Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Recent technical advancements and clinical applications of MR-guided radiotherapy in lung cancer treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Advancing the Collaboration Between Imaging and Radiation Oncology.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- Treatment planning evaluation and experimental validation of the magnetic resonance-based intrafraction drift correction.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Accuracy of deformable image registration-based intra-fraction motion management in Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- A strategy to reduce fraction number in peripheral lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- MRI-LINAC: A transformative technology in radiation oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Towards real-time radiotherapy planning: The role of autonomous treatment strategies.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) with real-time intra-fraction tumor motion monitoring allows for high precision Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR). This study aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility, patient satisfaction and delivery accuracy of single-fraction MR-guided SABR in a single day (one-stop-shop, OSS). Methods and Materials: Ten patients with small lung tumors eligible for single fraction treatments were included. The OSS procedure consisted of consultation, treatment simulation, treatment planning and delivery. Following SABR delivery, patients completed a reported experience measure (PREM) questionnaire. Prescribed doses ranged 28-34 Gy. Median GTV was 2.2 cm Results: All 10 patients completed the OSS procedure in a single day, and all reported satisfaction with the process. Median time for the treatment planning step and the whole procedure were 2.8 h and 6.6 h, respectively. With optimization of the procedure, treatment could be completed in half a day. During beam-on, the 3 mm tracking boundary encompassed between 78.0 and 100 % of the GTV across all patients, with corresponding PTV values being 94.4-100 % (5th-95th percentiles). On average, system-latency for triggering a beam-off event comprised 5.3 % of the delivery time. Latency reduced GTV coverage by an average of -0.3 %. Duty-cycles during treatment delivery ranged from 26.1 to 64.7 %. Conclusions: An OSS procedure with MR-guided SABR for lung cancer led to good patient satisfaction. Gated treatment delivery was highly accurate with little impact of system-latency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.