ArticleTrauma case reports2022
Osteotomy after medial malleolus fracture fixed with magnesium screws ZX00 - A case report.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnesium Bioabsorbable vs Titanium Screws in Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Medium-term Trial.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Magnesium-containing implants enhance bone healing: A mechanobiological perspective.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2025Review
- Translation of nanotechnology-based implants for orthopedic applications: current barriers and future perspective.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnesium alloys have recently become the focus of research, as these implants exhibit suitable biocompatibility and appropriate mechanical properties (Grün et al., 2018 [1]). Through intensive preclinical and clinical investigation, many questions regarding stability, biocompatibility and degradation behavior have been answered (Holweg et al., 2020 [2]). This case report aims to describe handling of these implants in a revision situation, especially when located in situ. To describe available options and relevant considerations, including planning and implementation, a revision surgery of a healed medial malleolus fracture is presented. A medial malleolus fracture was primarily treated by a trauma surgeon with two magnesium screws. Due to an osteochondral lesion of the talus, a revision surgery with osteotomy of the medial malleolus was necessary after 17 months. In this revision, conventional screw removal was not possible due to the degradation of the implant. Taking the degradation and the yield strength of the implant into account, we have chosen on the one hand to over-drill and on the other to leave and perforate the screw. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case study focusing on the clinical intraoperative site of human bone stabilized with magnesium screws. Despite the hydrogen gas production that occurs during degradation, a solid bone-to-implant interface was evident. With this report, we want to encourage the surgical user to get more involved with resorbable magnesium implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.