Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36217418›Full record

ArticleCrystal growth & design2022

Relating Crystal Structure to Surface Properties: A Study on Quercetin Solid Forms.

Panayiotis Klitou, Ian Rosbottom, Vikram Karde, Jerry Y Y Heng, Elena Simone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crystal growth & design, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Crystal structures of fisetin dihydrate and luteolin monohydrate: crystallization from ethanol-water mixtures.Acta crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Combined Experimental and Modeling Workflow to Tune Surface Properties of Organic Materials via Cocrystallization.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Panayiotis KlitouSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, Food Colloids and Bioprocessing Group, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Ln., Woodhouse, LeedsLS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Ian RosbottomDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, Imperial College Rd, South Kensington, LondonSW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Vikram KardeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, Imperial College Rd, South Kensington, LondonSW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Jerry Y Y HengDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, Imperial College Rd, South Kensington, LondonSW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2659-5500
Elena SimoneDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129TorinoTO, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4000-2222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surface energy and surface chemistry of a crystal are of great importance when designing particles for a specific application, as these will impact both downstream manufacturing processes as well as final product quality. In this work, the surface properties of two different quercetin solvates (quercetin dihydrate and quercetin DMSO solvate) were studied using molecular (synthonic) modeling and experimental techniques, including inverse gas chromatography (IGC) and contact angle measurements, to establish a relationship between crystal structure and surface properties. The attachment energy model was used to predict morphologies and calculate surface properties through the study of their growth synthons. The modeling results confirmed the surface chemistry anisotropy for the two forms. For quercetin dihydrate, the {010} facets were found to grow mainly by nonpolar offset quercetin-quercetin stacking interactions, thus being hydrophobic, while the {100} facets were expected to be hydrophilic, growing by a polar quercetin-water hydrogen bond. For QDMSO, the dominant facet {002} grows by a strong polar quercetin-quercetin hydrogen bonding interaction, while the second most dominant facet {011} grows by nonpolar π-π stacking interactions. Water contact angle measurements and IGC confirmed a greater overall surface hydrophilicity for QDMSO compared to QDH and demonstrated surface energy heterogeneity for both structures. This work shows how synthonic modeling can help in the prediction of the surface nature of crystalline particles and guide the choice of parameters that will determine the optimal crystal form and final morphology for targeted surface properties, for example, the choice of crystallization conditions, choice of solvent, or presence of additives or impurities, which can direct the crystallization of a specific crystal form or crystal shape.

Identifiers

PMID36217418
PMCPMC9542717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.