Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36217414›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental education research2022

Examining youth participation in ongoing community and citizen science programs in 3 different out-of-school settings.

Maryam Ghadiri Khanaposhtani, Heidi L Ballard, Julia Lorke, Annie E Miller, Sasha Pratt-Taweh, Jessie Jennewein, Lucy D Robinson, Lila Higgins, Rebecca F Johnson, Alison N Young and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental education research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Young people in iNaturalist: a blended learning framework for biodiversity monitoring.International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maryam Ghadiri KhanaposhtaniSchool of Education, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4636-8527
Heidi L BallardSchool of Education, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7841-8293
Julia LorkeNatural History Museum, IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5064-1744
Annie E MillerCalifornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6935-485X
Sasha Pratt-TawehNatural History Museum, Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity, London, England.ORCID 0000-0003-0629-5041
Jessie JenneweinNatural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Community Science Office and Urban Nature Research Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5227-5899
Lucy D RobinsonNatural History Museum, Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity, London, England.ORCID 0000-0001-8604-3447
Lila HigginsNatural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Community Science Office and Urban Nature Research Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8903-8619
Rebecca F JohnsonCalifornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2249-2643
Alison N YoungCalifornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8919-0661
Gregory B PaulyNatural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Community Science Office and Urban Nature Research Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2381-2576
Ana I Benavides LahnsteinNatural History Museum, Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity, London, England.ORCID 0000-0002-1135-3931

Funding

Wellcome Trust 206202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated youth participation in three Community and Citizen Science (CCS) programs led by natural history museums in out-of-school settings. Using second generation Activity Theory, we looked at repeated participation over time, collecting and then qualitatively analyzing ethnographic fieldnote observations on focal youth participation and components of the activity systems. We found each program provided multiple and unique access points for youth to participate in environmental science. Further, when facilitators emphasized the scientific goals of the programs clearly and repeatedly, youth participation in the scientific processes of the CCS programs deepened. Access to scientific tools, facilitation in using them, and repeatedly applying them in authentic research, enabled youth to participate in different aspects of CCS, from exploring to submitting biological data. Repeated participation in CCS activities provided the opportunities for youth to try the same type of participation multiple times (intensification), as well as provided the opportunity for youth to try different types of participation (diversification). Our findings suggest that repeated participation in authentic scientific research in CCS contexts fosters youth development of new roles and possible development of environmental science identities.

Indexed as

activity theorycitizen scienceInformal science educationparticipation

Identifiers

PMID36217414
PMCPMC7613686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.