ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2022
Re-Defining High Risk COPD with Parameter Response Mapping Based on Machine Learning Models.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nomogram based on quantitative lung CT features to identify cardiovascular disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and predict prognosis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a multimodal clinical-radiomics-deep learning nomogram based on automated chest CT segmentation for classifying COPD severity: a multicenter study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning based CT images for lung function prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Early warning and stratification of the elderly cardiopulmonary dysfunction-related diseases: multicentre prospective study protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Article
- Topologic Parametric Response Mapping Identifies Tissue Subtypes Associated with Emphysema Progression.Academic radiology · 2024Article
- A CT-Based Lung Radiomics Nomogram for Classifying the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Article
- Quantitative Assessment Characteristics of Small Pulmonary Vessel Remodelling in Populations at High Risk for COPD and Smokers Using Low-Dose CT.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Article
- Early user perspectives on using computer-aided detection software for interpreting chest X-ray images to enhance access and quality of care for persons with tuberculosis.BMC global and public health · 2023Review
- The utility of quantitative computed tomography in cohort studies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore optimal threshold of FEV1% predicted value (FEV1%pre) for high-risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using the parameter response mapping (PRM) based on machine learning classification model. Patients and Methods: A total of 561 consecutive non-COPD subjects who were screened for chest diseases in our hospital between August and October 2018 and who had complete questionnaire surveys, pulmonary function tests (PFT), and paired respiratory chest CT scans were enrolled retrospectively. The CT quantitative parameter for small airway remodeling was PRM, and 72 parameters were obtained at the levels of whole lung, left and right lung, and five lobes. To identify a more reasonable thresholds of FEV1% predicted value for distinguishing high-risk COPD patients from the normal, 80 thresholds from 50% to 129% were taken with a partition of 1% to establish a random forest classification model under each threshold, such that novel PFT-parameter-based high-risk criteria would be more consistent with the PRM-based machine learning classification model. Results: Machine learning-based PRM showed that consistency between PRM parameters and PFT was better able to distinguish high-risk COPD from the normal, with an AUC of 0.84 when the threshold was 72%. When the threshold was 80%, the AUC was 0.72 and when the threshold was 95%, the AUC was 0.64. Conclusion: Machine learning-based PRM is feasible for redefining high-risk COPD, and setting the optimal FEV1% predicted value lays the foundation for redefining high-risk COPD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.