Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36217312›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2022

Inconsistency in prevalence of hypertension based on self-reports and use of standard tests: Implications for large scale surveys.

Shri Kant Singh, Santosh Kumar Sharma, Sanjay K Mohanty, Rakesh Mishra, Akash Porwal, Bal Kishan Gulati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shri Kant SinghDepartment of Survey Research & Data Analytics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Santosh Kumar SharmaInternational Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Sanjay K MohantyDepartment of Population & Development, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Rakesh MishraMonitoring and Evaluation Consultant, UNICEF, India.
Akash PorwalPopulation Council, India.
Bal Kishan GulatiNational Institute of Medical Statistics, Indian Council of Medical Research, India.
International Institute for Population Sciences · INNational Institute of Medical Statistics · INPopulation Council Institute · INUnited Nations Children's Fund India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Biomarkers are increasingly integrated into population-based surveys to provide reliable estimates of the prevalence of specific diseases. The Demographic and Health Surveys have recently incorporated blood pressure measurements; however, little is known about the extent of agreement between measured and reported levels of hypertension in India. The objective of this study was to examine the extent of agreement between self-reported hypertension and the results of standard blood pressure measurements, as well as to explore the risk groups and factors associated with inconsistencies in self-reported and biomedically measured hypertension. Methods: Reliability measures such as sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were used to examine inconsistencies in self-reported and biomedically measured hypertension in the National Family Health Survey-4 data. Multilevel logistic models were adopted to analyse the respondent characteristics related to both false-positive and false-negative responses in the survey. Results: Compared to biomedically measured hypertension, self-reported hypertension was inconsistent and disproportionate at disaggregated levels in India. While self-reports severely underestimated hypertension among men aged 15-54 years and women aged 35-49 years, it overestimated hypertension among women below the age of 35 years. The inconsistency in self-reported and biomedically examined hypertension had deviations from a sex standpoint. Women aged <35 years reported a false-positive prevalence of hypertension. False-negative responses were elucidated among women aged ≥35 years and men aged 15-54 years. The likelihood of false-positive responses was higher among pregnant and obese respondents, and those who consumed alcohol. Conclusion: The significant deviance of self-reporting of hypertension from the prevalence derived based on standard tests further indicates the need for adopting standard tests in all emerging future large-scale surveys. A back-check survey is recommended to understand and differentiate the excessive false-positive reporting of hypertension among women aged 15-35 years.

Indexed as

False-negative errorsFalse-positive errorsHypertensionIndiaSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID36217312
PMCPMC9547289
OpenAlexW4300772582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.