Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36217291›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

Development of a Practical Screening Tool to Predict Sarcopenia in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Xiaoju Du, Guanjie Chen, Hailin Zhang, Yuping Liu, Feng Gu, Ying Wang, Lixia Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoju DuDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Guanjie ChenDepartment of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Hailin ZhangDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Yuping LiuDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Feng GuDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Ying WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Lixia YinHemopurification Center, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Sarcopenia is a common complication in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and can increase patient hospitalization and mortality. No simple and reliable tools to identify sarcopenia exist. We aimed to develop a screening tool to predict MHD patients at high risk for sarcopenia. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study included 589 and 216 MHD patients for training and validation sets, respectively. We used diagnostic criteria developed by the Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia to screen for sarcopenia. The risk prediction model was established by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to evaluate the model's discrimination ability, calibration ability, and clinical utility. RESULTS The incidence of sarcopenia was 17.1% in the training set and 18.1% in the validation set. We constructed prediction models applying age, body mass index, calf circumference, and serum creatinine and plotted a nomogram. The training set model had an AUROC of 0.922, sensitivity of 85.1%, specificity of 85.9%, and chi-square value (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) of 5.603 (P>0.05); the DCA diagram showed that when the threshold probability was 0 to 0.95, the model predicted a net benefit for sarcopenia in MHD patients. The validation set model had an AUROC of 0.913, sensitivity of 94.3%, specificity of 82.9%, and chi-square value (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) of 9.822 (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS The screening tool has good discrimination ability, calibration ability, and clinical utility. It could help to identify MHD patients at a high risk for sarcopenia.

Indexed as

SarcopeniaArea Under CurveCreatinineCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRenal DialysisCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID36217291
PMCPMC9569148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.