ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
Automated Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apnea-hypopnea index estimation using overnight chest-wall accelerometry.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Article
- Hypnogram and Hypnodensity Analysis of REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder Using Both EEG and HRV-Based Sleep Staging Models.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
- Breathtaking dreams: reduced REM phenotype in REM-related sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Article
- Overnight Sleep Staging Using Chest-Worn Accelerometry.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Maternal cardiorespiratory coupling: differences between pregnant and nonpregnant women are further amplified by sleep-stage stratification.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2023Article
- Overview of the hypnodensity approach to scoring sleep for polysomnography and home sleep testing.Frontiers in sleep · 2023Review
- Autonomic arousal detection and cardio-respiratory sleep staging improve the accuracy of home sleep apnea tests.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventionally, sleep and associated events are scored visually by trained technologists according to the rules summarized in the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Manual. Since its first publication in 2007, the manual was continuously updated; the most recent version as of this writing was published in 2020. Human expert scoring is considered as gold standard, even though there is increasing evidence of limited interrater reliability between human scorers. Significant advances in machine learning have resulted in powerful methods for addressing complex classification problems such as automated scoring of sleep and associated events. Evidence is increasing that these autoscoring systems deliver performance comparable to manual scoring and offer several advantages to visual scoring: (1) avoidance of the rather expensive, time-consuming, and difficult visual scoring task that can be performed only by well-trained and experienced human scorers, (2) attainment of consistent scoring results, and (3) proposition of added value such as scoring in real time, sleep stage probabilities per epoch (hypnodensity), estimates of signal quality and sleep/wake-related features, identifications of periods with clinically relevant ambiguities (confidence trends), configurable sensitivity and rule settings, as well as cardiorespiratory sleep staging for home sleep apnea testing. This chapter describes the development of autoscoring systems since the first attempts in the 1970s up to the most recent solutions based on deep neural network approaches which achieve an accuracy that allows to use the autoscoring results directly for review and interpretation by a physician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36217081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.