ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Prognostic factors in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia-novel tools for determining patient outcomes.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of machine learning-based prediction models for adult bowel necrosis for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Predictive value of the albumin-to-creatinine and bicarbonate-to-lactate ratios for 28-day mortality in acute mesenteric ischemia.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: The RADIAL Score.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Importance of Predicting Bowel Necrosis in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predictive factors for mortality in acute mesenteric ischemia.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Survival outcomes following surgery for acute mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective cohort analysis : Word count: 2471.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Non-enhancing bowel dilatation and secondary ileus on CT as a surgical red flag in geriatric patients with atypical presentations.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Revascularization Strategies for Acute and Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Insights into acute mesenteric ischaemia: an up-to-date, evidence-based review from a mesenteric stroke centre unit.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a devastating disease with poor prognosis. Due to the multitude of underlying factors, prediction of outcomes remains poor. We aimed to identify factors governing diagnosis and survival in AMI and develop novel prognostic tools.
methodsThis monocentric retrospective study analyzed patients with suspected AMI undergoing imaging between January 2014 and December 2019. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with confirmed AMI undergoing surgery. Nomograms were calculated based on multivariable logistic regression models.
resultsFive hundred and thirty-nine patients underwent imaging for clinically suspected AMI, with 216 examinations showing radiological indication of AMI. Intestinal necrosis (IN) was confirmed in 125 undergoing surgery, 58 of which survived and 67 died (median 9 days after diagnosis, IQR 22). Increasing age, ASA score, pneumatosis intestinalis, and dilated bowel loops were significantly associated with presence of IN upon radiological suspicion. In contrast, decreased pH, elevated creatinine, radiological atherosclerosis, vascular occlusion (versus non-occlusive AMI), and colonic affection (compared to small bowel ischemia only) were associated with impaired survival in patients undergoing surgery. Based on the identified factors, we developed two nomograms to aid in prediction of IN upon radiological suspicion (C-Index = 0.726) and survival in patients undergoing surgery for IN (C-Index = 0.791).
conclusionAs AMI remains a condition with high mortality, we identified factors predicting occurrence of IN with suspected AMI and survival when undergoing surgery for IN. We provide two new tools, which combine these parameters and might prove helpful in treatment of patients with AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.