Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36216710›Full record

ArticleTrends in plant science2023

Improving editing efficiency of prime editor in plants.

Niaz Ahmad, Muhammad Jawad Akbar Awan, Shahid Mansoor

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niaz AhmadAgricultural Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College (NIBGE-C), Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Jhang Road, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Jawad Akbar AwanAgricultural Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College (NIBGE-C), Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Jhang Road, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shahid MansoorAgricultural Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College (NIBGE-C), Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Jhang Road, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Electronic address: shahidmansoor7@gmail.com.
National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prime editing creates targeted insertions or deletions in the genome without double-stranded breaks (DSBs). However, prime-editing efficiency in plants is low, thereby limiting its utilization. A recent study by Zong et al. used a simple strategy that led to substantially improvements in the editing efficiency in both protoplasts and transgenic plants.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGenomePlants, Genetically Modifiedediting efficiencygenome editingplantsprime editor

Identifiers

PMID36216710
OpenAlexW4303423479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.