Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36216435›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Physiological Bases for the Superiority of Apolipoprotein B Over Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol as a Marker of Cardiovascular Risk.

Tamara Glavinovic, George Thanassoulis, Jacqueline de Graaf, Patrick Couture, Robert A Hegele, Allan D Sniderman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
26.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Features of Lipid Disorders in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamara GlavinovicDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6462-8858
George ThanassoulisMike and Valeria Centre for Cardiovascular Prevention, Department of Medicine McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9930-7189
Jacqueline de GraafUniversity of Nijmegen Radboud University Medical Center Department of General Internal Medicine Nijmegen the Netherlands.
Patrick CoutureUniversité Laval Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Quebec Canada.
Robert A HegeleRobarts Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2861-5325
Allan D SnidermanMike and Valeria Centre for Cardiovascular Prevention, Department of Medicine McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3540-3956
McGill University Health Centre · CACentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CARadboud University Nijmegen · NLWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2019, the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society stated that apolipoprotein B (apoB) was a more accurate marker of cardiovascular risk than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Since then, the evidence has continued to mount in favor of apoB. This review explicates the physiological mechanisms responsible for the superiority of apoB as a marker of the cardiovascular risk attributable to the atherogenic apoB lipoprotein particles chylomicron remnants, very low-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein particles. First, the nature and relative numbers of these different apoB particles will be outlined. This will make clear why low-density lipoprotein particles are almost always the major determinants of cardiovascular risk and why the concentrations of triglycerides and LDL-C may obscure this relation. Next, the mechanisms that govern the number of very low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein particles will be outlined because, except for dysbetalipoproteinemia, the total number of apoB particles determines cardiovascular risk, Then, the mechanisms that govern the cholesterol mass within very low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein particles will be reviewed because these are responsible for the discordance between the mass of cholesterol within apoB particles, measured either as LDL-C or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the number of apoB particles measured as apoB, which creates the superior predictive power of apoB over LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Finally, the major apoB dyslipoproteinemias will be briefly outlined. Our objective is to provide a physiological framework for health care givers to understand why apoB is a more accurate marker of cardiovascular risk than LDL-C or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesApolipoprotein B-100Apolipoproteins BBiomarkersCholesterolCholesterol, LDLChylomicron RemnantsHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansLipoproteinsLipoproteins, VLDLRisk FactorsTriglyceridesApolipoprotein B-100Apolipoproteins BBiomarkersCholesterolCholesterol, LDLChylomicron Remnantslipoprotein cholesterolLipoproteinsLipoproteins, VLDLTriglyceridesapoBapolipoprotein Bcardiovascular disease preventioncardiovascular risk

Identifiers

PMID36216435
PMCPMC9673669
OpenAlexW4304123548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.