Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36216423›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

HABIT: Health visitors delivering Advice in Britain on Infant Toothbrushing - an early-phase feasibility study of a complex oral health intervention.

Erin Giles, Faye Wray, Ieva Eskyte, Kara A Gray-Burrows, Jenny Owen, Amrit Bhatti, Tim Zoltie, Rosemary McEachan, Z Marshman, Sue Pavitt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Small teeth, big opportunities: strengthening oral health communication in early years settings.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin GilesSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK e.giles@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8631-4809
Faye WrayLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Ieva EskyteSchool of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9486-0033
Kara A Gray-BurrowsSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1550-5066
Jenny OwenSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Amrit BhattiSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Tim ZoltieSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3411-341X
Rosemary McEachanBorn in Bradford, Bradford Institute of Health Research, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1302-6675
Z MarshmanUniversity of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0943-9637
Sue PavittSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7447-440X
Robert M WestLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7305-3654
Peter F DaySchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9711-9638
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Bradford · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P017185/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo conduct an early-phase feasibility study of an oral health intervention, Health visitors delivering Advice on Britain on Infant Toothbrushing (HABIT), delivered by Health Visitors to parents of children aged 9-12 months old.

designA mixed-methods, early-phase, non-controlled, feasibility study.

participantsRecruitment consisted of Group A-HABIT-trained Health Visitors (n=11) and Group B-parents of children aged 9-12 months old about to receive their universal health check (n=35).

settingBradford, West Yorkshire, UK.

interventionA multidisciplinary team co-developed digital and paper-based training resources with health visitors and parents of young children. The intervention comprised of two components: (A) training for health visitors to deliver the HABIT intervention and (B) HABIT resources for parents, including a website, videos, toothbrushing demonstration and a paper-based leaflet with an oral health action plan. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment, retention and intervention delivery were analysed as key process outcomes for Groups A and B. Group B demographics, self-reported toothbrushing behaviours, dietary habits and three objective measures of toothbrushing including plaque scores were collected at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months post intervention.

resultsHABIT intervention delivery was feasible. Although the intended sample size was recruited (Group A=11 and Group B=35) it was more challenging than anticipated. Retention of Group B participants to final data collection was satisfactory (n=26). Total compliance with toothbrushing guidelines at baseline was low (30%), but significantly improved and was maintained 3 months after the intervention (68%). Plaque scores improved post intervention and participants found video recording of toothbrushing acceptable. Dietary habits remained largely unchanged.

conclusionThis feasibility study has demonstrated that HABIT is an appropriate oral health intervention. Adaptions to the study design are recommended to maximise recruitment and data collection in a definitive study. These quantitative findings have demonstrated an early signal of impact for improved oral health behaviours for young children at high risk of decay. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN55332414.

Indexed as

Nurses, Community HealthToothbrushingChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesHabitsHumansInfantOral HealthUnited Kingdomcommunity child healthpreventive medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID36216423
PMCPMC9557312
OpenAlexW4304080703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.