Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36216299›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2022

Predicting necessity of daily online adaptive replanning based on wavelet image features for MRI guided adaptive radiation therapy.

Haidy G Nasief, Abdul K Parchur, Eenas Omari, Ying Zhang, Xinfeng Chen, Eric Paulson, William A Hall, Beth Erickson, X Allen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haidy G NasiefDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Abdul K ParchurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Eenas OmariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Xinfeng ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Eric PaulsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
William A HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Beth EricksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
X Allen LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. Electronic address: Ali@mcw.edu.

Funding

Machine learning accelerated on-line adaptive replanningR01CA247960 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI PAULSON, ERIC S · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOnline adaptive replanning (OLAR) is generally labor-intensive and time-consuming during MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART). This work aims to develop a method to determine OLAR necessity during MRgART.

methodsA machine learning classifier was developed to predict OLAR necessity based on wavelet multiscale texture features extracted from daily MRIs and was trained and tested with data from 119 daily MRI datasets acquired during MRgART for 24 pancreatic cancer patients treated on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Spearman correlations, interclass correlation (ICC), coefficient of variance (COV), t-test (p < 0.05), self-organized map (SOM) and maximum stable extremal region (MSER) algorithm were used to determine candidate features, which were used to build the prediction models using Bayesian classifiers. The model performance was judged using the AUC of the ROC curve.

resultsSpearman correlation identified 123 features that were not redundant (r < 0.9). Of them 82 showed high ICC for repositioning > 0.6, 67 had a COV greater than 9% for OLAR. Among the 38 features passed the t-test, 25 passed the SOM and 12 passed the MSER. These final 12 features were used to build the classifier model. The combination of 2-3 features at a time was used to build the classifier models. The best performing model was a 3-feature combination, which can predict OLAR necessity with a CV-AUC of 0.98.

conclusionsA machine learning classifier model based on the wavelet features extracted from daily MRI for pancreatic cancer was developed to automatically and objectively determine if OLAR is necessary for a treatment fraction avoiding unnecessary effort during MRgART.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedBayes TheoremHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingParticle AcceleratorsMRI-guided adaptive radiation therapyMR-linacOnline adaptive replanningPancreatic cancerWavelets

Identifiers

PMID36216299
PMCPMC9838213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.