ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2022
SOPHIE: Generative Neural Networks Separate Common and Specific Transcriptional Responses.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Computational Landscape in Drug Discovery: From AI/ML Models to Translational Application.Scientifica · 2025Review
- N-of-one differential gene expression without control samples using a deep generative model.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Omics.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Using genome-wide expression compendia to study microorganisms.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide transcriptome profiling identifies genes that are prone to differential expression (DE) across contexts, as well as genes with changes specific to the experimental manipulation. Distinguishing genes that are specifically changed in a context of interest from common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) allows more efficient prediction of which genes are specific to a given biological process under scrutiny. Currently, common DEGs or pathways can only be identified through the laborious manual curation of experiments, an inordinately time-consuming endeavor. Here we pioneer an approach, Specific cOntext Pattern Highlighting In Expression data (SOPHIE), for distinguishing between common and specific transcriptional patterns using a generative neural network to create a background set of experiments from which a null distribution of gene and pathway changes can be generated. We apply SOPHIE to diverse datasets including those from human, human cancer, and bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. SOPHIE identifies common DEGs in concordance with previously described, manually and systematically determined common DEGs. Further molecular validation indicates that SOPHIE detects highly specific but low-magnitude biologically relevant transcriptional changes. SOPHIE's measure of specificity can complement log
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.