Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36215307›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Structured random receptive fields enable informative sensory encodings.

Biraj Pandey, Marius Pachitariu, Bingni W Brunton, Kameron Decker Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Biraj PandeyDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6681-7900
Marius PachitariuJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7106-814X
Bingni W BruntonDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4831-3466
Kameron Decker HarrisDepartment of Computer Science, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3716-6173

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brains must represent the outside world so that animals survive and thrive. In early sensory systems, neural populations have diverse receptive fields structured to detect important features in inputs, yet significant variability has been ignored in classical models of sensory neurons. We model neuronal receptive fields as random, variable samples from parameterized distributions and demonstrate this model in two sensory modalities using data from insect mechanosensors and mammalian primary visual cortex. Our approach leads to a significant theoretical connection between the foundational concepts of receptive fields and random features, a leading theory for understanding artificial neural networks. The modeled neurons perform a randomized wavelet transform on inputs, which removes high frequency noise and boosts the signal. Further, these random feature neurons enable learning from fewer training samples and with smaller networks in artificial tasks. This structured random model of receptive fields provides a unifying, mathematically tractable framework to understand sensory encodings across both spatial and temporal domains.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAnimalsMammalsNeurons, Afferent

Identifiers

PMID36215307
PMCPMC9584455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.