Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36215113›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2023

HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real-world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force.

Shirley V Wang, Anton Pottegård, William Crown, Peter Arlett, Darren M Ashcroft, Eric I Benchimol, Marc L Berger, Gracy Crane, Wim Goettsch, Wei Hua and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Shirley V WangBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7761-7090
Anton PottegårdUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9314-5679
William CrownBrandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter ArlettEuropean Medicines Agency, London, UK.
Darren M AshcroftSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Eric I BenchimolChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8855-3598
Marc L BergerIndependent Consultant, New York, USA.
Gracy CraneRoche Pharmaceuticals, Camberley, UK.
Wim GoettschThe National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Wei HuaUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Springs, Maryland, USA.
Shaum KabadiSanofi-Aventis US LLC, North Potomac, Maryland, USA.
David M KernJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Xavier KurzEuropean Medicines Agency, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9838-7754
Sinead LanganLondon School of Tropical Hygiene, London, UK.
Takahiro NonakaPharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency, Japan.
Lucinda OrsiniCOMPASS Pathways Ltd, Skillman, UK.
Susana Perez-GutthannRTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5798-3691
Simone PinheiroUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Springs, Maryland, USA.
Nicole PrattQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8730-8910
Sebastian SchneeweissBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2575-467X
Massoud ToussiIQVIA, France.
Rebecca J WilliamsBethesda, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Randomized Cardiovascular Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT DUPLICATE)R01HL141505 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCHNEEWEISS, SEBASTIAN G., WANG, SHIRLEY · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Understanding effectiveness of new drugs in older adults shortly after market entryR01AG053302 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WANG, SHIRLEY · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141505NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053302Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 205039/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemAmbiguity in communication of key study parameters limits the utility of real-world evidence (RWE) studies in healthcare decision-making. Clear communication about data provenance, design, analysis, and implementation is needed. This would facilitate reproducibility, replication in independent data, and assessment of potential sources of bias. WHAT WE DID: The International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) and ISPOR-The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) convened a joint task force, including representation from key international stakeholders, to create a harmonized protocol template for RWE studies that evaluate a treatment effect and are intended to inform decision-making. The template builds on existing efforts to improve transparency and incorporates recent insights regarding the level of detail needed to enable RWE study reproducibility. The overarching principle was to reach for sufficient clarity regarding data, design, analysis, and implementation to achieve 3 main goals. One, to help investigators thoroughly consider, then document their choices and rationale for key study parameters that define the causal question (e.g., target estimand), two, to facilitate decision-making by enabling reviewers to readily assess potential for biases related to these choices, and three, to facilitate reproducibility. STRATEGIES TO DISSEMINATE AND FACILITATE USE: Recognizing that the impact of this harmonized template relies on uptake, we have outlined a plan to introduce and pilot the template with key international stakeholders over the next 2 years.

conclusionThe HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility (HARPER) helps to create a shared understanding of intended scientific decisions through a common text, tabular and visual structure. The template provides a set of core recommendations for clear and reproducible RWE study protocols and is intended to be used as a backbone throughout the research process from developing a valid study protocol, to registration, through implementation and reporting on those implementation decisions.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesOutcome Assessment, Health CareHumansPharmacoepidemiologyReproducibility of Resultsprotocolreal world evidencereproducibilitytransparency

Identifiers

PMID36215113
PMCPMC9771861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.